This text is replaced by the Flash movie.
 

Posts Tagged ‘ Sophos ’

By Nick Mediati

August 13, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO – Got an iPhone or iPad? Be sure to update to iOS 4.0.2 for iPhone and iOS 3.2.2 for iPad. The two updates fix the nasty security flaw that made the widely publicized JailbreakMe hack possible.

The JailbreakMe exploit was, well, nasty. It made use of an apparent flaw in how iOS handles PDF documents (this bug shouldn’t affect other PDF readers, just the iOS one, according to Sophos).

Security expert Charlie miller characterized the JailbreakMe exploit as “very beautiful work,” and said that it’s ” scary how it totally defeats apple’s [sic] security architecture.” So while jailbreakers might be disappointed to see this hack go away, for everyone else it’s probably for the best. I mean, if a security bug can jailbreak your phone, there’s no telling what else it could do.

There’s no word yet on whether or not iOS 4.0.2 un-jailbreaks your phone if you’ve already done the deed, so if you’ve jailbroken your iPhone 4 then upgraded to iOS 4.0.2 we’d love to hear from you.
For more details, see the iOS 4.0.2 and iOS 3.2.2 pages on Apple’s support site.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

By Jared Newman
May 24, 2010

facebookSAN FRANCISCO – Facebook’s privacy problems reportedly have the social network rethinking its approach, and a new poll suggests that the threat of user decline is real, but don’t expect a mass exodus any time soon.

A poll by U.K.-based security firm Sophos found that 30 percent of its 1,588 respondents will “probably” quit Facebook due to privacy concerns, and 30 percent are “highly likely” to do so. Another 16 percent have quit already.

At issue are changes to the site that allow select external Web sites to automatically log your activity and share it with your friends. For example, Pandora will share your listening habits, and the only way to stop it is through a multi-step opt-out process. It’s not highly sensitive information, but the uproar evolved into a bigger discussion about how Facebook is trying to make more user data public.

Sophos’ poll is nice for grabbing headlines, but it doesn’t reflect what’s happening in the wider world. For a moment, let’s put aside the poll’s unscientific nature — the respondents are readers of Sophos’ blog, suggesting a greater concern for privacy and security — and look at some other statistics.

Earlier this week, Fortune reported that Facebook gained 10 million users since the network announced the privacy changes. And then there’s this gem of a Facebook group, “Millions Against Facebook’s Privacy Policies and Layout Redesign,” which has over 2 million members who don’t understand irony. An organized “Quit Facebook Day” is planned for May 31, but the 12,335 commitments as of this writing won’t make a dent in Facebook’s user base of 500 million.

Alas, reports of a backlash are overblown, at least as far as the general populace is concerned, and it’s easy to understand why. The very nature of Facebook — a social network that’s already used by all your friends — makes quitting hard. Even if you found a comparable service, like the open-source Diaspora, you’d still have to convince all your friends to come with you, and they’d have to convince their friends, and so on.

Which brings us back to Sophos’ poll. Graham Cluley, a senior technology consultant for the firm, acknowledged that people who responded to the poll are not typical Facebook users. But, he said, “such people are also likely to have the ear of other users, and as privacy and online safety become more key concerns for the public they will look to experts as to whether certain social networks are acting in their best interests or not.”

I doubt they will. Experts are full of great advice that we don’t listen to — they’ve been talking about this exercise thing for years, but obesity still lives large — so why would people quit a service that offers so much for something not immediately noticeable like privacy? The masses won’t leave Facebook unless a better product comes along. And obesity’s going to stick around until someone invents a vegetable that tastes like bacon.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

By Erik Larkin
February 1, 2009

SAN FRANCISCO – Experts agree that Windows 7 has enhanced security to ward off attacks on vulnerabilities in old software. But what if a money-minded online scammer can persuade you to download malware onto your PC?

“Windows 7 is more secure, and upgrading to it is a big improvement,” says Chester Wisniewski, a senior security advisor with software-maker Sophos. “But it’s not going to stop malware in its tracks.”

Exploits Take a Hit

Digital crooks generally use two tactics to install malware on a PC. Exploits often take the form of a snippet of attack code hidden on a Web page–often a hacked-but-otherwise-benign site. When you browse the page, the exploit hunts for software flaws in Windows or in third-party programs such as Adobe Flash or QuickTime. If it finds one, the exploit may surreptitiously install malware without any hint of the attack.

In contrast, social engineering attacks try to trick you into downloading and installing bot malware that poses as a useful program or video. Some attacks combine tactics, as when a scammer sends an e-mail message encouraging you to open an attached PDF file, only to trigger an exploit buried in the file that then hunts for a flaw in Adobe Reader.

Security upgrades in Windows 7 could help prevent many attacks that target software flaws. ActiveX attacks, once the bane of Internet Explorer users, may “pretty much disappear” due to IE 8′s Protected Mode, says H.D. Moore, chief security officer at Rapid7 and creator of the Metasploit testing tool.

The arcane-sounding Address Space Layer Randomization makes it harder for crooks to find a vulnerability for a running program in your computer’s memory. The related Data Execution Prevention feature attempts to prohibit an attack from taking advantage of any flaw that it may discover.

“These two, in particular, could have a very large impact,” says Wisniewski. Still, though ASLR and DEP were expanded to protect more programs in Windows 7 than in Vista, they don’t cover all applications.

Vista Safer Than XP?

For a sense of what that impact might be, we can look at how Vista fared against malware. Microsoft’s latest Security Intelligence Report covers the first half of 2009, prior to Windows 7′s release. It’s based on data from the Malicious Software Removal Tool, which Microsoft distributes via Automatic Updates to fight common malware infections. According to that data, the infection rate for an up-to-date Vista computer was 62 percent lower than that for an up-to-date XP system.

It’s possible, of course, that Vista users are technologically savvier on average, and so less likely to fall victim to malware. The sample sizes for XP and Vista, which Microsoft didn’t include in the report, might skew the statistics, as well.

But Sophos’s Wisniewski thinks that ASLR and DEP are factors, too. And since those features are expanded in Windows 7, there’s reason to hope they’ll continue to be effective.

“I don’t see this going away anytime soon,” says Moore. He notes that there are plenty of ways crooks can and likely will continue to ply their evil trade against the new OS. But “it does raise the bar,” Moore says.

Hacking People, Not Programs

Exploit-based attacks may be harder to pull off against Windows 7, but social engineering attacks may be as dangerous as ever. And the theoretically less-annoying User Account Control does little to disable poisoned downloads.

In October, Sophos ran a test to see how Windows 7 and UAC would handle malware. First, the testers grabbed the first ten samples of malicious software that came into their lab. They then ran those samples on a fresh Windows 7 machine with UAC at its default settings, and with no antivirus installed.

Two samples couldn’t run on Windows 7 at all. But at its default setting, UAC blocked only one sample, leaving seven pieces of malware that loaded right up.

Sophos’s test highlights two points. First, Wisniewski and others say, UAC isn’t designed to block malware as much as it is to encourage programmers to write software that doesn’t require special privileges–so you shouldn’t count on it for protection.

Second, if a bad guy tricks you into downloading a Trojan horse, ASLR and DEP don’t matter. IE 8′s SmartScreen filter and similar features in other browsers might block known nasties, but the malware universe is bigger than that.

Social engineering ruses include using a hijacked social network account to send malware lures to friends of the owner, sending a link to a supposed video taken of a friend, and hiding a poisoned URL in a shortened link of the type commonly used on Twitter. (For more on such dangers, see “How to Stop 11 Hidden Security Threats.”)

Toss in other tried-and-true scams such as videos that instruct you to in­­stall a codec file (but instead lead you to a malware download), and phony documents attached to e-mail messages that appear to come from coworkers, and it becomes clear why Windows 7 users can’t let their guard down.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

October 6, 2009

IT security and data protection firm Sophos has warned users of Microsoft‘s online services such as Hotmail to change their passwords immediately.  The warnings come after it was revealed yesterday that 10,000 usernames and passwords were publicly disclosed from users of hotmail.commsn.com, and live.com e-mail services. All of the accounts initially posted begin with the letter A or B, suggesting that this may be the tip of the iceberg.

The precise cause of the leak is still unclear and Microsoft has said it is actively investigating the situation.  Speculation abounds that the data has been collected via a phishing scam in which fake websites are used to trick people into revealing personal details.

SophosLabs revealed last month that at least one third of users who change their passwords every 90 days would have been protected from public disclosures like this.

Sophos also advises IT administrators to take the opportunity to remind their users to change Microsoft Live!, MSN, and Hotmail passwords as well as making sure their anti-spam protection is current.  Now is a perfect time to educate users about phishing and clicking links in email.

Chester Wisniewski, senior security advisor, Sophos said, “My recommendation for users of Microsoft’s online services is to change your passwords immediately. You are better to be safe than sorry, and password rotation is something we are often too lazy to do. This is a great time to log into those Facebook, Twitter, Gmail, and Yahoo! accounts and do likewise as a simple best practice to prevent yourself from becoming a victim of habit.”

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

September 7, 2009

IT security and data protection firm Sophos has announced it has been positioned by Gartner in the Leaders’ Quadrant of the Magic Quadrant for Mobile Data Protection 2009.

Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for Mobile Data Protection (MDP) is based on an assessment of a company’s ability to execute and completeness of vision. According to Gartner, “Leaders have products that work well for Gartner clients in small and large deployments. They have long-term road maps that follow and/or influence Gartner’s vision of the developing needs of buyers in the market. Leaders make their competitors’ sales staffs nervous and force competitors’ technical staffs to follow their lead. Their MDP products are well-known to clients, and they are frequently found on RFP shortlists.”

“We believe Gartner’s evaluation and placement of Sophos in the Leaders’ Quadrant further underscores the company’s strategic acquisition of Utimaco, and the impact our combined organisation will have on this growing market,” said Steve Munford, chief executive officer at Sophos. “Protecting sensitive data is top of mind among all businesses today, and our mission is to arm IT organisations with solutions that simplify how they address and manage this concern, and successfully comply with increasing regulatory compliance demands.”

The report observed that, “Mobile data protection systems and procedures are needed to protect data privacy and to comply with audit requirements, and every company must include MDP in its IT operations plan. This Magic Quadrant is a snapshot of the overall market. The Leaders’ Quadrant denotes vendors with a balance of strengths.”

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark


IT security and data protection firm Sophos has published its report on the latest trends in spam, revealing the top twelve spam-relaying countries for the second quarter of 2009. By scanning all spam messages caught in SophosLabs‘ global network of spam traps, researchers have identified the top ‘Dirty Dozen’ spam relaying nations between April and June this year.

During the second quarter of 2009, the USA continued to relay more spam than any other country – the nation’s 15.6% contribution to global spam traffic meaning that more than one in six junk e-mails were sent through compromised computers in the country.  In contrast, Russia, a former spam super-power, continues to fall down the ranks.

Russia currently resides at ninth position in the chart, relaying a mere 3.2% of spam messages.  This represents a significant reduction compared to the same time last year when the country came second only to the United States and was responsible for relaying 7.5%of all spam e-mails.

Poland has seen the biggest single increase in spam output since the last quarter, moving up from tenth to sixth place in this global ‘hall of shame’, with the country now responsible for relaying 4.2% of all the world’s electronic junk messages.  Colombia is the only nation to have left the ‘Dirty Dozen’ since Q1 2009, with Vietnam a new entry this quarter.

The top twelve countries responsible for relaying spam across the globe between April and June 2009 are as follows:

1.  United States15.6%
2.  Brazil11.1%
3.  Turkey5.2%
4.  India5.0%
5.  South Korea4.7%
6.  Poland4.2%
7.  China (including Hong Kong)4.1%
8.  Spain3.4%
9.  Russia3.2%
10. Italy2.8%
11. Argentina2.5%
12. Vietnam2.3%
Others35.9%

“Barack Obama’s recent speech on cybersecurity emphasised the threat posed by overseas criminals and enemy states, but these figures prove that there is a significant problem in his own back yard. If America could clean up its compromised PCs, it would be a considerable benefit to everyone around the world who uses the net,” said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant for Sophos.  ”All Web users need to properly defend their computers from attack, and pledge to never act upon spam messages.”

Spammers exploiting new vectors of attack
Over the past year, the booming popularity of social networking – in particular, micro-blogging service Twitter – has driven growth in services such as TinyURL, bit.ly and is.gd.  The services are used to create conveniently shortened links that re-direct to Web pages with lengthier URLs.  This is being exploited by hackers that will use the services to obscure links to offensive material or malicious Web sites, and then distribute the links in spam e-mails, as well as posting them on Twitter and other networks.

Earlier this year, link-shortening service Cligs was attacked by hackers, who redirected links created with the service to a single site of their choice – demonstrating how unsuspecting Web users can find themselves visiting unexpected Web sites when clicking on shortened links.  As social networking and related online services continue to grow in popularity, Sophos experts note that poorly protected computer users could become more vulnerable to a wider range of spam attacks.

“Clearly the problem isn’t going away, as is illustrated by the large number of sprawling spam campaigns we see on a daily basis,” continued Cluley.  ”Although it may seem encouraging to see reductions in the volume of spam that certain countries are contributing, authorities, ISPs and home users across the world need to be doing more to crack down on the spam problem.”

Spam relayed by continent, April-June 2009
Overall by continent, Asia continues to be the biggest offender.  Almost a third of spam message originated in the region for the second quarter of 2009, with the nations of South Korea and China being the biggest contributors.

1.  Asia31.7%
2.  Europe27.1%
3.  South America19.4%
4.  North America18.8%
5.  Africa2.0%
6.  Oceania0.6%
Others0.4%

Sophos recommends companies automatically update their corporate virus protection, and run a consolidated solution at their e-mail and Web gateways to defend against viruses and spam.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Spammers use King of Pop’s death to harvest email addresses IT security and control firm Sophos is warning users to be wary of spam messages using the untimely death of music legend Michael Jackson to harvest unsuspecting computer users’ e-mail addresses for future spam campaigns.

Approximately eight hours after the King of Pop’s death yesterday, SophosLabs witnessed the first wave of spam messages taking advantage of the breaking news in the subject line and body of the email.

In these messages, the spammer claims that they have vital information about the death of Michael Jackson to share with somebody – ie. the user. Sophos experts note that the body of the email does not contain any call-to-action links – such as a URL, e-mail address or phone number – and the ‘from’ e-mail address is bogus, however the spammer can easily harvest recipients’ email addresses via a free live email address if computer users reply to the spam message.

“The untimely death of the King of Pop, Michael Jackson, has sent shockwaves through the entire world – but unfortunately, this type of huge news story is also the perfect vehicle for spammers to snare vulnerable computer users,” said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos. “These spammers are relying on curious users to reply to their bogus claims – but if you receive one of these messages you just need to delete it.”

“We’ve also discovered cybcercriminals taking advantage of the sad death of 70s TV icon Farrah Fawcett to spread fake anti-virus software, so users should certainly remain vigilant. The fact is that cybercriminals have no respect for taste and decency. The only thing they are interested in is making some money for themselves, and turning other computer users’ lives into a misery.”

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

IT security and control firm Sophos is urging iPhone and iPod Touch users to upgrade their devices with the latest version of Apple’s eagerly awaited operating system – not just for the enhanced usability features, but because the update fixes more than 40 security vulnerabilities. Existing iPhone users can update their operating system for free via iTunes to version 3.0, and take advantage of a number of longed-for new features such as cut-and-paste, spotlight search and a landscape virtual keyboard.  However, Sophos experts note that Apple has also included a number of important security patches inside the update, making it crucial for both sets of users to patch as quickly as possible.  Sophos warns that the iPod Touch customers are required to pay USD9.95 for the privilege.

According to an advisory on Apple’s Web site, iPhone OS 3.0 patches 46 vulnerabilities, including some that could potentially allow hackers to run malicious code on a user’s iPhone if they visited a booby-trapped Web site or viewed a specially-crafted image file.

“If left unpatched, hackers could run malware on your iPhone just by you visiting a website or viewing a maliciously-crafted image,” explained Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos.  ”Although we haven’t come across any examples of hackers creating malware to exploit these vulnerabilities as yet, it is vital that iPhone and iPod Touch users understand the importance of this latest update.  Without it, they are leaving themselves potentially wide open to attack – it pays to remember that no operating system is invincible.”

“There’s no doubt that some iPod Touch users will be unhappy that they have to pay for their devices to be fixed, and it’s certainly unusual for a company to charge for important security patches like this,” continued Cluley. “In an ideal world Apple would make free fixes available for iPod Touch users who don’t feel they need cut-and-paste and other new features, but do want to be able to use the internet securely.”

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

IT security and control firm Sophos is urging iPhone and iPod Touch users to upgrade their devices with the latest version of Apple’s eagerly awaited operating system – not just for the enhanced usability features, but because the update fixes more than 40 security vulnerabilities.

Existing iPhone users can update their operating system for free via iTunes to version 3.0, and take advantage of a number of longed-for new features such as cut-and-paste, spotlight search and a landscape virtual keyboard.  However, Sophos experts note that Apple has also included a number of important security patches inside the update, making it crucial for both sets of users to patch as quickly as possible.  Sophos warns that the iPod Touch customers are required to pay $9.95 for the privilege.

According to an advisory on Apple’s Web site, iPhone OS 3.0 patches 46 vulnerabilities, including some that could potentially allow hackers to run malicious code on a user’s iPhone if they visited a booby-trapped website or viewed a specially-crafted image file.

“If left unpatched, hackers could run malware on your iPhone just by you visiting a website or viewing a maliciously-crafted image,” explained Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos.  ”Although we haven’t come across any examples of hackers creating malware to exploit these vulnerabilities as yet, it is vital that iPhone and iPod Touch users understand the importance of this latest update.  Without it, they are leaving themselves potentially wide open to attack – it pays to remember that no operating system is invincible.”

“There’s no doubt that some iPod Touch users will be unhappy that they have to pay for their devices to be fixed, and it’s certainly unusual for a company to charge for important security patches like this,” continued Cluley. “In an ideal world Apple would make free fixes available for iPod Touch users who don’t feel they need cut-and-paste and other new features, but do want to be able to use the internet securely.”

For more information, please visit: www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/06/18/apple-update-fixes

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Sophos


IT security and control firm Sophos has revealed that a new Web-based attack, JSRedir-R, has blown all previous Web-based malware out of the water, and is currently being found six times more often than its nearest rival.

During the last seven days, almost half of all malicious infections found on Websites were caused by Troj/JSRedir-R.  Mal/Iframe-F, which has been the most widespread Web-based threat for more than a year, accounted for just seven percent of infections this week.  Overall, Sophos sees one new infected Webpage every 4.5 seconds – three times more than in 2007.

“No one should be in any doubt that the Web is still the main vector of attack for cybercriminals, and this new threat suggests this situation isn’t going to change anytime soon,” said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos.  ”The problem is that too many computer users still think there’s no danger in surfing the Web, but with legitimate sites often falling victim to these attacks, it’s time to wake up.  Hackers won’t stop targeting the Web as it’s proving a successful way for them to spread their infections.  To combat this, it’s essential to scan every Website for malicious code before visiting it.”

JSRedir-R, which has been found on high traffic legitimate Websites, loads malicious content from third-party sites (including one called Gumblar.cn, inspiring some security vendors to dub the threat ‘Gumblar’) without users’ knowledge.  The malware can then be used to steal sensitive information for financial gain, to commit identity theft or to meddle with search engine results.

Sophos customers are already protected against this threat.  Sophos advises users of other anti-malware solutions to check their products are updated and offering protection.

For more information, including a chart showing JSRedir-R’s dominance over other malware infections, please visit Graham Cluley’s blog at http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/05/14/malicious-jsredir

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Subscribe E-Newsletter

Don't get left behind. Sign up to receive the latest news.

Our Sponsors
Kerio
Ozaki
redwood
Super Micro
Kaspersky
KOSS
Xitrix
Western Digital
Emerson
Copylandia
JobsDB
ePLDT
Bitdefender
Multi-Color
mseedsystems
Smart
Peplink
Sophos
Astaro
itproasia
MEC
APC
wsi
Wolfpac
ArcusIT
 
 
 
PC World Magazine Subscription
subscribe now
Web Design