advertiser here
 

Posts Tagged ‘ iPhone ’

By Barbara E. Hernandez
September 3, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO – In a continuing trend, more businesses are shifting loyalties from Blackberry to iPhones and Android devices as the relative newcomers make inroads into the corporate world. Three-quarters of the 200 businesses surveyed in the United States and the U.K in the study reported that their employees are choosing other than Blackberry, Sanford C. Bernstein Ltd. reported to Bloomberg. The number was 83 percent for U.S. companies.
The biggest drop comes as bankers, lawyers and government workers – Blackberry’s once-loyal clientele – abandon the phones for other brands on the market.

Several studies on smartphones have predicted the trend, including Nielsen Co. which said that new subscribers for Blackberry dropped and more than half of Blackberry users planned to switch to an iPhone or Android phone. Last month a study by the NPD Group also reported that in 2010′s second quarter, Android phones rose to 33 percent of the market and Research in Motion’s Blackberry dropped to 28 percent. The Apple iPhone was 22 percent of the smartphone market.

One of the latest products, the Blackberry Torch 9800, was deemed adequate but hardly competitive with recent Android devices and the iPhone. With a sluggish browser, a small and low-resolution touchscreen and a cramped keyboard, the phone may only appeal to previous Blackberry users and loyalists. Some are calling RIM’s latest smartphones consolation prizes for executives who wish they could have an iPhone. Others are comparing RIM to IBM because it cornered the market for several years but seemed to stop reinventing itself or innovating.

The business world has spoken loudly and clearly, they want more from RIM and if it expects to stay relevant the company needs to comply. The next few years will tell us if RIM is still able to compete and innovate in the quicksilver mobile arena.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark
By Mark Sullivan
August 26, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO – If you have an iPhone, this experience may be familiar: Your phone shows only a bar or two, and either you can’t make a call or the call you do make is so scratchy and garbled that the person you’re calling can’t understand what you’re saying. Meanwhile, right next to you, someone on a different AT&T phone connects without a hitch and chats away happily. I decided to informally test whether there’s a solid basis for that common gripe. My findings: The two iPhones I tested had lower rates of connecting successfully and had poorer voice quality in AT&T low-signal areas than did two non-Apple AT&T phones that I tested under the same conditions.

I tested four phones on AT&T service in two cities over three days. I drove around San Francisco and Los Angeles comparing the performance of the iPhone 4 and the iPhone 3GS against the performance of the RIM BlackBerry Bold 9000 and the Pantech Impact in voice calls placed at roughly the same time from areas where coverage from the AT&T network is less than optimal.

What I found was surprising. Calls on the iPhone 4 and iPhone 3GS failed to connect or dropped in midcall far more often than did calls on the other two phones, and the iPhone calls that connected successfully sounded marginally worse than calls placed with the BlackBerry and Pantech phones.

My testing is not meant to be scientific or definitive, but the results raise real questions about the world’s favorite smartphone: Is the iPhone a great personal computing device but a bad phone? Please click the chart below to see average call quality scores (on a 1-5 scale) for all test calls made in San Francisco and Los Angeles.

Testing Methodology

I made test calls from seven medium- to low-signal locations in San Francisco; then I validated my results with a second round of testing at the same locations two days later. Finally, I performed similar tests from five locations in Los Angeles. I tested from various locations, including a parking garage, a forest, a train station, a library basement, and a moving bus. I noted each dropped or failed call, and scored each successful call that I made using the five-point Mean Opinion Score (MOS), a scale developed by Bell Labs to quantify call quality. (Please see the “Mean Opinion Scoring Guide”–the rightmost column in the accompanying chart–for definitions of the possible call quality scores, 1 through 5.)

At locations where my first call on a given phone dropped, I noted the drop and then placed an additional call, applying a MOS number to the second call if it completed successfully. Obviously, I couldn’t give a voice quality score to a phone if it failed in both attempts to complete a call at a certain location.

The Dropped-Call Champions

The data point that sticks out in my results is the number of dropped or failed calls placed by iPhones during my tests, especially in the San Francisco tests. In total, the iPhone 4 dumped or couldn’t connect in half of test calls — 14 out of 28 — in low-signal areas. The iPhone 3GS did even worse, connecting only 12 calls in 30 attempts, for a success rate of 40 percent.

Meanwhile the iPhones’ competition in our tests proved far more reliable in dealing with less-than-ideal signal strength. The least expensive phone in our tests–the Pantech Impact–had zero failed or dropped calls in the 19 test calls I placed on it, despite poor cell conditions. The BlackBerry Bold 9000 was also far more reliable than the iPhones, connecting on 18 out of 21 test calls in Los Angeles and San Francisco.

Call Quality

I also evaluated the voice quality on calls that connected successfully. In my conversations with a colleague in the PC World office, I listened for things like drop-outs, static, thin or fading voice, delay, and garble, and I gave each call a MOS score based on the cumulative disruption caused by these imperfections over the course of the call.

Here, the results were more favorable to the iPhone, and much closer across the four phones I tested. All four phones earned average MOS score of between 3 and 4 (that is, between “annoying” and “fair”), a range that is said to be typical of calls placed on cell phones.

On average, the iPhone 3GS scored the worst of the four phones in call quality. The 12 calls (out of 30 total) that the 3GS managed to connect and hold received an average MOS score of 3.16 (out of a possible 5). The iPhone 4, with its improved antenna (provided you hold it just so), fared a little better than its predecessor did in my call quality tests. The 14 (out of 28) successful test calls placed on the iPhone 4 averaged a mark of 3.27, also between “annoying” and “fair” on the MOS scale, though again, like the iPhone 3GS’s score, closer to “annoying.”

The BlackBerry Bold 9000 produced the highest-quality voice calls overall in my tests. Calls made with the Bold 9000 had an average MOS score of 3.77 across 18 test calls, putting it near the upper end of the range between “annoying” and “fair.” The Pantech Impact also outperformed the iPhones in call quality, with an average MOS score of 3.61 for its 19 test calls.

Conclusions

The iPhone’s poor performance in my tests could have been caused by myriad things, from the tuning of the iPhone antenna to the amount of network resources AT&T allocates to voice calls placed by iPhones specifically.

Neither AT&T nor Apple offered any sort of explanation. In response to a request for comment, an AT&T spokesperson said merely: “We recommend you reach out to the device manufacturers.” Apple did not return our calls requesting comment.

The iPhone is undeniably a superb device for browsing the Web, playing games, and watching videos. Further, the iPhone 4 clearly improved on its predecessor in microphone quality, speaker quality, and noise cancellation effectiveness, all of which help make voice calls sound great–when cell service is strong.

But at least for now, weak cell-signal zones are a fact of life for just about everybody, whether you encounter them on the road, in your office, or in your living room. Cell signals also tend to degrade when making their way through the walls of our homes, necessitating an amplifier–or in AT&T’s case, a Microcell–that, more often than not, you have to pay for. And wireless operators usually invest in additional cell towers and in radio improvement only when increased traffic levels (which translate into average revenue) are likely to be high enough to justify the capital expense.
While we don’t have the resources to do our testing nationwide, the data I collected in San Francisco and Los Angeles, combined with the anecdotal evidence, is enough to indicate that iPhones may well have more difficulty than other phones placing calls in areas of less-than-optimal wireless service.

If you’re considering buying an iPhone, and phone calls are important to you, it’s wise to take the time to test the phone for as long as laws in your state allow to understand how well the device works in the low-signal areas you frequent.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Use Facebook Places

By Fei on August 23, 2010

By Patrick Miller
August 23, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO – Facebook’s new Places feature lets you share your current location by “checking in” from your smartphone. Whether you never really got into earlier location-based social networking services like Gowalla or Foursquare or just want to know what it is (and how to turn it off), read on for everything you need to know about Facebook Places.

Keep in mind that Places isn’t available everywhere just yet–early reports indicate that it’s United States-only, for now, but with significant gaps at the moment–so you may just have to wait.

Checking In Via Smartphone or PC

Before you can share your location with your Facebook friends, Facebook needs to know where you are. Just open touch.facebook.com in your Web browser (or use the Facebook for iPhone app on your iPhone, iPod Touch, or iPad), and you’ll see a tab under “Inbox” called “Places.” For the iOS app, it’ll show a new icon in the middle of the home screen.
Tap Places, and you’ll see your recent check-ins as well as your friends’ check-ins. From here, you can find out more details about the places your friends are checking into (map location, description, directions, comments, and other check-ins), or you can check yourself into a nearby location by pressing the Check In button at the top-right corner of the page.

If you can’t find the right place to check in from, you can browse more nearby locations by pressing the right arrow button under the Places tab until you find it (if you’re using the iPhone app, just scroll all the way down and press Show More Nearby Locations).

The list of available locations comes from other people’s check-ins and listings from Bing’s mapping engine, so you might have to add your location yourself–just press Add, and it will take you to a page where you can fill out a name and description.

Once you tap Check In, you’ll be presented with a list of nearby locations where other people have checked in. Tap the one you want to check into, and you can choose to comment on what you’re doing there or add your Facebook friends to your check-in (Press the What are you doing? and Tag Friends With You buttons, respectively). Next, press the big Check In button, and it will show up on your News Feed.

While Places is mostly meant for smartphone users, it doesn’t depend on a GPS device to find your location–you can check in from a laptop or iPod Touch, too. Just go to touch.facebook.com in your browser (you’ll need Internet access, of course), and you can check in from your desk or café.

Checking In With Friends

Unless you’re on Facebook just to show everyone what a loner you are, you’ll eventually want to add the friends you’re hanging out with to your Facebook Places check-in. All you have to do is choose the Tag Friends With You option while checking in.

Once you’ve added your friends and checked in, it’ll show up on their News Feed as well. If they haven’t used Facebook Places yet, it won’t show up on their feed until they’ve approved the check-in; they’ll see a little alert the next time they log in, asking them to allow or deny the check-in.

You can add friends only when you’re checking in, so if you forget about adding someone and want to add them later, you’re out of luck.

This can be rather tricky for users concerned about privacy–while researching this piece, I checked several of my PCWorld colleagues into local bars at about 11am on a workday–so if you want to use Facebook Places without letting your friends check you in, you can disable it by turning off Friends Can Check Me Into Places in the privacy settings (click the link for detailed instructions). Once this is disabled, your friends can still try to add you at check-in time, but it won’t display on the actual check-in.

Owning Your Facebook Place

While anyone can add a Facebook Place, business owners can turn the listing in Places into a proper Facebook Page, with Likes and a Wall and all that other fun stuff. (Don’t forget to read “Three Ways Business Can Take Advantage of Facebook Places.”)
Start by checking in from your Place (or adding it, if it doesn’t show up in the list of nearby Places), and click the link on the bottom of the page that says Is this your business?

Facebook doesn’t want people cybersquatting on someone else’s business listing, so you’ll have to check a box certifying you’re an official representative of the business and click Proceed with Verification to continue.

Next, you’ll have to provide your business’s contact information, including your Federal Employee ID number (if applicable) and some kind of official documentation (Certificate of Formation, Articles of Certificate of Incorporation, a local business license, or a BBB accreditation).

Once you’ve submitted that information and received the okay from Facebook’s User Operations team, you’ll be in full control of your new Place. No word on what happens if you’re caught impersonating an employee, and we don’t recommend trying it.

How To Turn Off Facebook Places

Dabbled with Facebook Places and decided it isn’t for you? There are a handful of settings you’ll have to change to fully deactivate it. Start by going to Account, Privacy Settings, and click Customize settings under Sharing on Facebook.

From here, you’ll need to change the settings for Places I Check In, People Here Now, and Friends Can Check Me into Places (under the Things Others Share heading).

You’ll need to change one more setting: Go back to Privacy Settings, choose the Edit your settings option under the Applications and Websites heading, and click Edit settings for Info accessible to your friends.

Uncheck the Places I’ve Visited box, and you’ll be good to go. For a more detailed explanation of what each option does and where to find it, check out, if you haven’t already, “Facebook Places: How To Adjust Your Privacy Settings.”

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark
By Tony Bradley
August 20, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO – Mobile business professionals have been able to sync Google Docs to the iPad and have access on the go even without a live network connection using the Memeo Connect app, but iPhone users were out of luck. Now, Memeo is launching version 2.0 of Memeo Connect–including an iPhone app extending the Google Docs capabilities to the popular smartphone.

Spencer Chen, director of corporate communications for Memeo, described the hurdles to developing the iPhone version of Connect. “It’s hard to believe, but iPhone support had a hard time making it onto our roadmap due to the many commitments to our partners, such as Google, Western Digital, Seagate, Netgear, and most recently Sony. But we couldn’t ignore our users…they were screaming for iPhone support.”

Aside from introducing an iPhone version of the app, Connect 2.0 also adds new features and capabilities to the Memeo app. Connect can now perform Google-powered searches of the full text of Google Docs content. The app also now provides a “download all” Google Docs option, as well as the ability to cancel all uploads.

The Connect 2.0 app–especially with the addition of the Connect app for the iPhone–is a great tool for businesses that are using Google Apps for business productivity. Microsoft still has a dominant position–a virtual monopoly–on the business productivity with the Microsoft Office suite, and on messaging with Microsoft Exchange, but Google is making progress in convincing businesses to adopt its cloud-based alternative.

While Google is aggressively trying to stake its place in larger enterprises–such as the city of Los Angeles or the United States government–it still faces a tough battle. Chen notes “The data, statistically and anecdotally, is clearly telling us that Google Docs adoption remains in the mid-market…the SMBs and very small enterprises,” adding “The disruption always comes from the low-end off the market. Enterprise adoption is coming along slower, but that shouldn’t surprise anyone. Microsoft Office just celebrated its 20th birthday and Google Apps is not going to displace that overnight.”
Chen also had some thoughts to share on the competitive landscape. “Memeo Connect’s unfair advantage will always be our ‘backend’…Google. Our deep partnership and even deeper product integration provides customers with the ideal joint solution. Memeo’s proven expertise in data management and file sync together with Google’s mind-numbing portfolio of web technologies makes for a formidable content management offering.”

While I agree with Chen that Memeo–with its partnership and integration with Google–has some distinct advantages over competing platforms such as Box.net or Dropbox, that relationship is both a blessing and a curse. Memeo has an upperhand when it comes to organizations adopting Google Docs–those organizations are in the minority. Organizations that haven’t embraced Google may find more benefit from using a less Google-centric solution.
Regardless, Connect 2.0 introduces some useful functionality, and those organizations or business professionals that do use Google Docs will welcome the capabilities Memeo brings to the iPad and iPhone platforms. Check out the new and updated apps in the Apple App Store.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark
By Liane Cassavoy
August 18, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO – Research In Motion isn’t the only company attempting to launch a cell phone that combines a touchscreen with a hardware keypad: Nokia is getting in on the act, too. The Finnish phone maker today announced the Nokia X3 Touch and Type, the first S40 phone to feature a touchscreen and a 12-button keypad. But, given the tepid response to the new BlackBerry Torch, you have to wonder if people are interested in phones with these hybrid designs.

Nokia’s X3 Touch and Type may have an advantage over the BlackBerry Torch in that it is not supposed to be a high-end smartphone designed to compete with the iPhones and Droids already on the market. Instead, Nokia’s X3 is aimed at consumers shopping for a standard cell phone.

The X3 comes in five colors, and sports a super-slim design, measuring less than 0.4 inches thick. It also offers as a 2.4-inch touchscreen, 3G and WLAN support, FM radio, a music player, and a 5-megapixel camera with 4X digital zoom. The phone runs Nokia’s popular S40 software, which isn’t a true smartphone OS, but does offer access to Nokia’s Ovi Store for downloading apps.

Nokia says that “in certain markets” the X3 will come with Ovi Music Unlimited, the rebranded version of what was once called Nokia’s “Comes With Music” service. That service, the launch of which had been delayed in the U.S., offers unlimited music downloads to mobile phone owners for 12 to 18 months.

Nokia says the phone is designed for users who want to keep the benefits of a hardware keypad for “fast, one-handed, one-thumb” texting, but who also want to enjoy the benefits of a touchscreen.

“Innovation is not just a high-end game,” Mary McDowell, Nokia’s executive vice president of mobile phones, says in a statement announcing the X3′s launch. “The Nokia X3 is a great example of bringing new consumer value to lower price points.”

But the price of the Nokia X3 may not be that low: Nokia says the phone will sell for 125 Euros (as of this writing, that’s the equivalent of about $160) when it is launched in the third quarter of this year. Nokia has not said if the phone will be available in the U.S., but if the X3 does make its way to our shores, that price would be significantly higher than what many average cell phones cost. Nokia’s phones, though, are typically sold unlocked, so you pay more for a phone that doesn’t require you to commit to a lengthy service contract with a carrier. Should a U.S. carrier offer the X3 Touch and Type, the price would likely go down.

Even if the price were to go down, would people be interested in the Nokia X3′s Touch and Type design? I think it would be a hard sell. For one, the touchscreen measures just 2.4-inches diagonally. That’s going to feel pretty small when you start tapping on it. And then you have to use the numeric keypad for composing messages — an inelegant solution at best. I think Nokia would be better served by offering a bigger touchscreen (3.5 inches, at least) and ditching the keypad entirely. Or, simply ditch the touchscreen and offer a full keyboard, instead.

As it stands, the X3 Touch and Type looks like a phone that’s trying to offer a little bit of everything, and one that will, in the end, please very few.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Make Money Selling Your Old Tech

By Fei on August 18, 2010

By Elsa Wenzel
August 18, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO – Like a new car that plummets in value once you drive it off the dealer’s lot, electronics are worth less the moment you slip them out of the box. The bad news is, there’s nothing you can do about tech depreciation.

The good news is, you can probably find a market for the gear you no longer want. Unloading spent gadgets can put cash in your pocket that you can reinvest toward the latest technology.
Companies shedding old electronics used to have to pay other companies to help with disposal and with legal compliance. Now, however, you have numerous options for handling the process yourself.

In addition to the broader online marketplaces of Craigslist and eBay, specialized Web-based services will pay you for, and then resell or recycle, used electronics. In many cases the amount they’ll pay for goods that are only several seasons old can amount to more than half of the initial ticket price. What’s the best way to navigate this market?

How to Sell

For the greatest resale value later, when you buy new, keep the original box, cables, and software intact. When you’re ready to give your gear a new home, polish that laptop up and send it packing with its manual enclosed.

It takes only minutes to look up a quote for an item on a reselling service’s Website and then request a prepaid shipping envelope. Within a few days you can send away the unwanted stuff and then receive the money via PayPal or a check in the mail.

However, though you may lose money allowing electronics to sit around and depreciate, it’s also a waste of payroll hours if you spend a day scheming how to yield a $30 return from a five-year-old GPS device. Although selling one item at a time can give a minor payback, you’ll get the biggest reward by dealing with at least a handful of goods simultaneously. If your company had to shed five employees in lean times, for example, selling their orphaned desktops and flat-screen monitors in one swoop can help recover some losses.

What to Sell

Smartphones and laptops–particularly from Apple–tend to fetch the highest prices. Digital cameras, MP3 players, HDTVs, storage drives, and inkjet printers are among the hardest sells. If you hold on to any product for long enough that its resale value evaporates, you might as well donate it to a school, or maybe to a tech museum.

If you want the latest laptop every few months, or if you need a team of workstations to serve temporary workers for only one quarter, renting electronics can save you money and prevent the pile-up of old tools in the first place.

Cell Phone Recycling

You can find a plethora of phone-recycling services that pay a pretty penny for relatively new smartphones. To start, EcoSquid lets you search multiple Websites to compare offers for old handsets, and then takes a share if you make a transaction with a referred service. A number of sites specialize in iPhone recycling and trade-ins.

Getting rid of a handset before its service contract expires can ring up an early-termination fee of up to $350, depending on your wireless carrier. CellSwapper and CelltradeUSA arrange for users to get around the penalty by swapping phone plans and phones.

I found it hard on both sites to browse listings casually, however. CelltradeUSA provides a form through which you can contact other users, and charges $20 if you complete a trade. Once you list your phone and service contract, you have to wait for potential takers to reach you. I could find only one iPhone owner with an AT&T contract similar to my own, and no BlackBerry users with the equivalent. On CellSwapper, searches weren’t working after I made several attempts of seeking someone to switch early out of a 24-month contract with AT&T to new Verizon service.

Among the services that pay for old phones but don’t deal with contracts, Cell for Cash, Sell Your Cell, and Simply Sellular offered some of the highest quotes–up to $144 for a 16GB iPhone 3G, and $110 for a BlackBerry Bold 9000. (See the chart at right for more details.) If you want to sell more than phones, sites with a broader focus, such as BuyMyTronics, Gazelle, and NextWorth (more below), offered competitive price quotes.

It’s wise to wipe text messages, contacts, calendar items, and other data off a phone even if you’re sending it to a service that promises to do the same–especially when those security pledges are vaguely worded. Remote wiping is available for the iPhone with a MobileMe account, and for the BlackBerry 6 operating system. For businesses, software such as that of AirWatch can provide deeper device management.

Instant Quotes, Simple Shipping

BuyMyTronics, Gazelle, and NextWorth are competing services that offer cash or credit for an array of electronics. Each Website displays an immediate price quote once you describe the condition of the item you’re selling. Although I saw plenty of information for Apple computers on these sites, I couldn’t find quotes for a ThinkPad laptop. Some of the products I looked up weren’t listed on NextWorth at all.

After you click to commit to a sale on one of these sites, you need to mail in the gear via prepaid shipping that arrives at your door. The service adjusts the quoted price if the item doesn’t match your description. When the transaction is done, you get payment via check, PayPal, or a store gift card.

Comparing quotes for the same products, I saw few drastic differences among the sites. A 16GB, first-generation iPod Touch would fetch $51 on Gazelle, a dollar more on BuyMyTronics, or $63 on NextWorth. The same kind of iPod in varying levels of condition was going for between $100 and $200 on Craigslist in the San Francisco Bay Area, and had sold for between $58 broken and $148 in great shape on eBay.

Price quotes showed a bigger range for larger and less-popular items. BuyMyTronics quoted $41, NextWorth quoted $66, and Gazelle quoted $95 for a 1GHz, 60GB Apple iBook G4. A Garmin Nuvi 785T GPS device, not found on BuyMyTronics, would garner $35 at Gazelle and almost $84 at NextWorth. For older, less desirable goods, such as a Canon SD400 Elph digital camera, you’d be lucky to get $10. I couldn’t find any takers for a year-old Canon inkjet or an older HP laser printer.

Bulk-resale options for small businesses are available at Gazelle and elsewhere. If you’re planning to off-load a bunch of machines, contact the services directly.

As for security, each service pledges to wipe data from your equipment, but the details are relatively slim.

Brett Mosley, CEO of BuyMyTronics, says his company resells tens of thousands of units–more than two-thirds of what it buys–on other sites, including Amazon and eBay. It refurbishes another 15 percent of the items it receives, and sends another 15 percent off for recycling in first-world countries.

Vendor Trade-In Programs

If you’re a brand loyalist, trading in a product through the company that made it can help you afford a same-name upgrade. Apple offers gift cards toward new purchases if you send an approved Mac or PC laptop or desktop to partner PowerON, which provides a prepaid shipping label and a box. On the other hand, recycling a PC or monitor through Apple partner WeRecycle involves paying a $30 charge.

HP’s trade-in program pays in credit toward a new HP purchase for sending in equipment–from copiers to workstations–made by HP and other companies. This could be the best deal for getting old printers out of the office, since few third-party services take them. HP charges $15 to scrub data off your devices according to Department of Defense standards. HP’s return-for-cash options include consumer buyback and asset return for businesses.
If you’re buying a new PC from Dell, that manufacturer will take any other old computer from you for free. The quarterly Greenpeace Guide to Greener Electronics can tip you off to recycling options from other big electronics brands, although most don’t provide payment or credit.

Selling on Craigslist

If you don’t mind meeting up with strangers, the Craigslist Website is among the fastest options for selling items locally. Depending on your region, you might also reap a higher price than you would on a tech-resesller specialty site; for instance, San Francisco-area Craigslist users selling the Kindle 2, which would fetch $71 or less on BuyMyTronics and its competitors, were asking between $100 and $169. Plus, Craigslist can be a good option for getting rid of printers, monitors, and other gear that resellers often reject. Remember, though, that the asking prices don’t reflect what buyers end up paying. For more advice, check out our tips for using Craigslist.

If you don’t want to post a custom ad, field e-mail messages from real people, and take the time to arrange for an in-person pickup and payment, the online reseller services are a better fit. Then again, you might also consider even less formal channels of exchange online, such as advertising what you’re getting rid of through Facebook or informing your Twitter followers.

Selling on eBay

If you’re already an eBay aficionado, selling electronics there could be convenient and may return a higher price than what you can get elsewhere. In recent weeks the Kindle 2 sold for $120–or, loaded with books, for up to $209. The site is likely a time sink, however, if you’re a first-time user who hasn’t built up a reputation or learned the ins and outs of online auctions.

In any case, research on eBay can give you an idea of a product’s fair market value. You can use the advanced search function to scour completed listings for what people paid in the end for items, versus the list prices, which often differ wildly. You’ll have to sign in to view the results, which cover only the past 15 days.

eBay users were willing to pay a range of prices for a 16GB, first-generation iPod Touch: from $56 for a broken device up to $148 for one with cosmetic wear and tear. An Apple iBook 1GHz G4 fetched between $40 and $170, depending on the condition. Don’t forget to review eBay’s fees before launching an auction.

Selling Media Items on Glyde

If you have a surplus of DVDs, CDs, video games, and books, Glyde is an up-and-coming service for selling and buying media. Unlike with eBay, users involved in a transaction don’t learn each other’s identity; and unlike with Craigslist, buyers can pay by credit card. Red Dead Redemption for the PlayStation 3, for example, is selling on Glyde for about $41, including shipping. NextWorth says it will pay $28 for the same game with normal wear and the original case. Amazon offers store credit for used games.

Selling on Amazon

Amazon allows smaller companies (including some tech resellers) to piggyback on its infrastructure and sell things through its WebStore. However, this service is for selling in bulk, not one-off unloading. After a 30-day free trial, pricing options start at $10 per month with a 7 percent cut of completed transactions.

In-Store Programs

RadioShack accepts some equipment that other services do not, such as car stereo amplifiers, radar detectors, and mice. In exchange for a store gift card, its Trade & Save program offers prepaid shipping of phones, GPS devices, cameras and camcorders, gaming consoles, games, and MP3 players.

The TechForward program at RadioShack, Office Depot, and online via Tiger Direct and CompUSA stores offers a resale program of sorts for consumers who upgrade frequently. You buy a TechForward plan at the time of a new product purchase. Six months later, you can return the product and receive half of its initial price, which you can use toward a newer model.

Printer-Cartridge Recycling

Makers of printers increasingly offer free mail-in recycling for empty ink cartridges, but you can earn back some of the fortune you lost buying printer consumables. Staples stores offer modest coupons for bringing in spent ink cartridges.

Environmental Office Solutions pays money for empty inkjet and laser toner cartridges, as well as cell phones. For a far-from-paperless office, a pile of cartridges with a return amount of $3 to $10 each can add up. The company says the most popular toners it takes include the HP C8543X, CE250, and CC530 cartridges. Inkjets fetch a few dollars less, with the HP 28 and 22, and the Canon CL41, among the most wanted. If you have more than 150 cartridges, Environmental Office Solutions takes bulk orders.

Donate Gear for a Tax Break

Giving away tech for resale through a group such as Goodwill can result in tax deductions for charitable contributions, with the side benefit of enhanced community relations. The nonprofit TechSoup has information on giving equipment to other nonprofits.

Compliance

Businesses must take extra steps to ensure that their getting rid of old gear complies with the law. In some municipalities you can be fined for tossing electronics into Dumpsters. The federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act makes it illegal to carelessly dispose of goods containing hazardous materials, such as lead-laced CRT monitors. Electronics make up 2 percent of municipal waste and are the fastest-growing portion of the waste stream, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

Saying good-bye to old computers and hard drives isn’t just about getting rid of the equipment, but also clearing the data they store. Companies dealing with sensitive financial information have to consider the Sarbanes-Oxley and Gramm-Leach-Bliley acts. Those who work in healthcare must follow HIPAA regulations.

That’s why it pays to research security and data-wiping options before handing your laptops or smartphones over to strangers. You can delete the data yourself. If you sell to a third-party service, see that it follows Department of Defense data-destruction standards.

Responsible Recycling

There’s no law against shipping electronics overseas to developing nations for unsafe recycling–and that’s a problem. Just because you’re selling electronics to a willing buyer doesn’t mean that the product will wind up disassembled in a way that doesn’t pollute or harm workers.

“Typically cell phones have a better reuse and recycling market than computers do,” says Sheila Davis, executive director of the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition. And companies reselling phones to developing nations are usually doing the right thing environmentally.

Only 10 percent of obsolete computers, however, are recycled according to high human-rights and ecological standards.

“If they’re taking your computer for free or giving you money for it, more than likely they’re not handling it properly, because it actually costs money to recycle properly,” says Davis.

Only recyclers certified through the Basel Action Network’s e-Stewards program are certified not to ship equipment overseas for unsafe labor, not to use prison labor, and not to incinerate items.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark
By Barbara E. Hernandez
August 16, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO – The Apple iOS, which runs on its iPhone, iPod Touch, and iPad, has a flaw in how it reads PDF documents that makes it easier to hack. This flaw is exploited by JailbreakMe, a one-click site that makes it easy for anyone without any real tech skills to hack into their own iPhone.

The flaw lets JailbreakMe open up an Apple operating system, and enables the user to load non Apple-approved applications on to an Apple device. JailbreakMe brought the security risk to light, finally causing Apple to release security updates for iOS 4.0.2 for iPhone and iPod touch and iOS 3.2.2 for iPad this week. (By the way, doesn’t this sound a lot like the same security flaw that Adobe learned about in late July?)

But the threat to the iOS is not the operating system itself but in its third-party software, such as the Safari browser, QuickTime, Java, or apps from Adobe. Nonetheless, it’s Apple that bears the responsibility for monitoring security, since it’s made the choice to use the software and package it for users. This is a weird conundrum since Apple believes in the “walled garden” approach to applications. Shouldn’t it be patrolling the garden more?

Android has similar issues, such as an innocuous Jackeey wallpaper application that retrieved personal information from each phone that downloaded its application. Neither JailBreakMe nor Jackeey were hacking into anyone’s phone; however, their code could be used for evil rather than good, which worries most security experts.

So how does Apple’s security for its mobile operating system stack up against that of Google’s Android, the biggest competitor?

1. Walled Garden v. the Wild Jungle

The biggest problem with Apple’s security is its walled garden philosophy, which relies on the wisdom of Apple approving applications rather than by consensus or the individual user. While many Apple fans say this decreases iOS problems, others say that it actually contributes to them by closing a door on the application after it has gained entrance into the App Store. Apple’s gatekeeping system on its walled garden is also virtually unknown, and it may also prove to give a false sense of security.

The Android Market, on the other hand, resembles a swap meet. The applications are available without restriction, and are monitored and reviewed by users themselves, including analyzing code–something not offered by Apple. While some worry that the free-for-all will be a security risk, at least one security research firm, Lookout, says Android’s applications are less problematic than Apple’s.

2. Pig-in-the-Poke v. the Test-Drive

Another way that app security for the Linux-based Android platform is better is that each application must disclose to the user what part of the device it plans to use and how. Google also publicly talks about operating a “honeypot,” or a computer not hooked up to all parts of its system, which monitors Android applications for malicious programs. Such open discussion is not part of Apple’s corporate climate, users frequently don’t know what they are buying until damage is done–but if they’re lucky, they found out about their vulnerability through JailbreakMe.

3. Freedom v. Establishment

With Google’s new App Inventor, you don’t have to be a software engineer to create an application for the anything-goes Android platform. Not so at Apple. It takes an experienced software developer to create anything on the iOS, and it’s up to the corporate honchos at Apple to approve it. As for security in the “walled garden,” there are no guarantees.

While the iPhone has some important security features, like sophisticated memory protection and a required digitally signed code requirement, security analysts say Android’s protection is stronger because of its source openness and the way it isolates applications which causes less harm to users. While business owners should block or limit access to applications to company machines to protect their data, the Android platform may prove just a little safer.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark
By Nick Mediati

August 13, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO – Got an iPhone or iPad? Be sure to update to iOS 4.0.2 for iPhone and iOS 3.2.2 for iPad. The two updates fix the nasty security flaw that made the widely publicized JailbreakMe hack possible.

The JailbreakMe exploit was, well, nasty. It made use of an apparent flaw in how iOS handles PDF documents (this bug shouldn’t affect other PDF readers, just the iOS one, according to Sophos).

Security expert Charlie miller characterized the JailbreakMe exploit as “very beautiful work,” and said that it’s ” scary how it totally defeats apple’s [sic] security architecture.” So while jailbreakers might be disappointed to see this hack go away, for everyone else it’s probably for the best. I mean, if a security bug can jailbreak your phone, there’s no telling what else it could do.

There’s no word yet on whether or not iOS 4.0.2 un-jailbreaks your phone if you’ve already done the deed, so if you’ve jailbroken your iPhone 4 then upgraded to iOS 4.0.2 we’d love to hear from you.
For more details, see the iOS 4.0.2 and iOS 3.2.2 pages on Apple’s support site.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark


August 6, 2010


Ozaki has unveiled several additions to its lineup of iPad and iPhone accessories, headed by the iFinger stylus. Designed for users who have a touchscreen Apple device, the iFinger features a very soft tip that offers a more delicate touch than the human finger. It thus protects the touchscreen from scratches and gets rid of fingerprint smudges.

iFinger stylus M measures only four centimeters in length and comes with a strap which can be attached to the Apple device. Longer at 12.5 centimeters, the iFinger L has a double feature: the other end of it is a ballpoint pen so users get a pen and a stylus all in one. Both iFinger models come in black or white.

Ozaki is exclusively distributed in the Philippines by MSI-ECS.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Which Smartphone Should I Get?

By Fei on August 6, 2010

By Elsa Wenzel
August 6, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO – It’s time to ditch my battered BlackBerry 9000. Whether the successor should be a newer BlackBerry, an iPhone, an Android handset, or something else entirely is up in the air. Is it worth waiting for something that’s not out yet, like the Windows 7 phone?

My wish list for a new phone includes reliability, a speedy Web browser, lots of options for apps, a decent camera, Wi-Fi, and GPS. Easy access to Gmail and Google Docs would be great.

Many shiny, new handsets beckon, but I don’t want to take a leap of faith or greed without advice. Which smartphone should it be? (You can help by voting at the end of this post.)

iPhone 4

The legendary loyalty of iPhone users doesn’t stop with all-night lines outside of Apple stores prior to the launch of a new handset. Despite the “antennagate” debacle and complaints of a bad proximity sensor, surveys show that most owners remain satisfied with their iPhones. (Yet, maybe the surveys spoke too soon.)

The slim iPhone 4 for AT&T has a 3.5-inch display with the best resolution available on any phone. Multitasking and cut-and-paste functions make this 1GHz, 802.11n model more work-ready than its predecessor–even if multitasking isn’t up to snuff. The 5-megapixel camera and HD video, plus the FaceTime videophone app, add to the appeal.
With more than 200,000 iOS apps available, the iPhone has the largest marketplace of mobile downloads. These include practical tools for work as well as less useful ones for play. The apps easy to discover and a snap to download and buy, and organizing them has improved with the introduction of Folders.

Among the drawbacks to the iPhone are the touchscreen-only keyboard, which can lead to a minefield of typos, especially when larger fingers are tapping. The lack of Flash support is more annoying on the iPad than the phone, but irksome nonetheless.

Also, do I really want a smartphone that drops calls if held a certain way, or that requires wearing a funky case to function properly? It’s hard to stomach the chairman and CEO of a company address a product flaw by pointing fingers at rival companies, and offering customers little but a Band-Aid workaround and a short, 30-day return window.

Droid X

Unlike with Apple’s iOS, you can choose from among many phones that run the Android operating system. Among these, the sold-out Motorola Droid X for Verizon is perhaps the most appealing.

Comparisons abound between the competing handsets from Apple and Motorola. A speedy, 1GHz processor and HD video are among their shared selling points. Yet, the Droid X comes with a 16GB microSD card, while the iPhone lacks expandability. The Droid X‘s call quality attracts better ratings than that of the iPhone 4, it’s supposed to offer an hour longer of talking time, and it’s got an 8-megapixel camera. Its 4.3-inch display dwarfs that of the iPhone 4.

Flash support will come later with Android 2.2 and more business-friendly features. In addition, the Droid X can serve as a Wi-Fi hotspot. However, I’ve heard users complain about limited battery life and new Motoblur software.

There’s no push-button keyboard on the Droid X, but Swype for Android lets you “type” by dragging your finger across the screen from one letter to the next. This is faster than touchscreen “tapping”, even if it leads to hilarious typos.

While the Android apps marketplace is smaller than the iPhone app store, it’s bound to grow, especially because Google App Inventor‘s interface makes it easier for budding developers to build apps.

Unfortunately, rogue apps are reportedly leaving Android phones dangerously hackable. Do you really want to integrate your professional and private life on a device that’s prone to invasion? Then again, recent headlines about Android security threats have been overblown.

BlackBerry Torch 9800

Maybe the best replacement for a BlackBerry is another BlackBerry. RIM had fallen behind on the “wow” factor in the smartphone market, but its new handset blends next-generation features found in Android devices and the iPhone. The 1GHz BlackBerry Torch 9800 slider combines a QWERTY button keyboard and a large touchscreen display,a nd it has 802.11n Wi-Fi. The BlackBerry 6 operating system includes the WebKit browser with tabs for online multitasking, as well as remote data-wiping options in case of theft or loss.

Unfortunately, BlackBerry App World is a disappointment, not just because it’s clunky to find and buy apps, but because, in general, their volume and quality pales next to the options for Android and iOS. Despite the other bells and whistles on a new BlackBerry handset, it’s hard to imagine RIM catching up in the apps arena anytime soon.

And, although BlackBerry remains the best choice for those whose companies lean on its mobile infrastructure, that’s not the case with my job.
Carriers

Since I have an AT&T account with a legacy, all-you-can-eat data plan, I’m not tempted to switch carriers and get nasty surprises on the next bill. But if AT&T doesn’t supply the best phone for me, would another carrier’s plan be affordable? Could it even cost less than the $130 I shell out each month? That’s what I paid in the last billing cycle to talk for 841 minutes, send 523 text messages, and receive 481 texts. I also sent or received 11 MMS messages, and Internet data usage reached 17.74 MB.

The Choice

Of course, these aren’t the only options for a BlackBerry 9000 replacement. Maybe the Microsoft Windows Phone 7, upon release, will look more alluring than in its recent iPhone-mimicking preview. Could Palm’s WebOS even see a resurgence?

Then again, since I don’t use my mobile phone often for calls, maybe a better investment is a hybrid tablet-phone. As a phone, the Dell Streak is a bit clunky–still more portable than Gordon Gekko’s Motorola DynaTAC–but it might do the job.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Our Sponsors
Oversoul
Ozaki
redwood
Super Micro
Kaspersky
APC
T0shiba
Western Digital
wsi
Copylandia
Astro
ePLDT
eStudio
Multi-Color
Oxford Makati
Smart
Peplink
Sophos
Symantec
TRICOM
Kerio
Bitdefender
 
 
Subscribe E-Newsletter

Don't get left behind. Sign up to receive the latest news.

 
PC World Magazine Subscription
subscribe now
Web Design