This text is replaced by the Flash movie.
 

Posts Tagged ‘ iPad ’

Touchscreen smartphones up 138%

By on February 11, 2010

By Lexton Snol
February 11, 2009

LONDON – For the first time ever, smartphones with touch screens accounted for more than half of all smartphone shipments globally in Q4 2009, taking 55 percent of the market.
According to the latest Canalys estimates, touch-screen smartphone shipments were up 138 percent year on year in Q4, reaching almost 30 million units, in a quarter where overall smartphone market growth stood at 41 percent.

Canalys puts total touch-screen smartphone shipments for the year at over 75 million, more than double the 2008 figure. Total smartphone shipments in 2009 hit a new peak of 166 million units.

“Looking at the whole of 2009, it is no great surprise to see Apple at the top of the table of leading vendors of touch-screen smartphones,” said Canalys analyst Tim Shepherd.

“But Nokia stands out as a very close second, seeing tremendous growth thanks to models such as the Nokia 5800 and N97. And Nokia was actually the leading vendor by volume of touch-screen smartphones in the final quarter of the year.”

After Apple and Nokia, HTC and Samsung took the third and fourth spots, though Canalys notes that Samsung also ships a lot of touch-screen mobile phones that are not smartphones.

Independent research conducted by Canalys with 4,000 consumers toward the end of last year showed that 60 percent of those interviewed wanted a touch-screen interface on their next mobile phone.

And although some existing users said they will switch back to a different interface, Canalys expects the overall shift toward touch screens to continue during 2010.

User interface (UI) design and the input technology vendors build into their handsets is a factor in attracting customers to particular devices, but Canalys points out that it is also key to enabling discovery, acquisition and usage of new applications and services.

“This is an area where Apple is still in an enviable leadership position, having built up a vast, easy-to-access library of content and applications that will help continue to drive the success of not only the iPhone, but also the other devices it launches, such as the iPad,” noted Canalys VP and principal analyst Chris Jones.

Explore the virtual BlackBerry

“For vendors with similar aspirations, attracting developers to their chosen smartphone platforms is an ongoing challenge, especially as more platforms and application stores launch onto the market.

“Developer bandwidth is as big an issue for this industry as network bandwidth. And if you get it right, you have a much more effective lock-in when that user comes to replace their device, it isn’t just about building new revenue streams.”

Canalys research shows that Symbian remained by far the largest smartphone OS by shipment volume in 2009, increasing in absolute terms despite losing share to the much faster growing RIM, Apple and Android.

Compare best mobile phone deals

Canalys consumer research shows that the handset vendors whose users have the highest propensity to stay loyal to their current brand are Apple, Nokia and RIM.

“It is no coincidence that the brands with the highest churn inertia are also the leading smartphone makers,” added senior analyst Pete Cunningham.

“These devices typically demand, and reward, a higher level of time investment on the part of the user. If you have customized your device and set it up so that you can use your preferred email and social networking clients, navigation solution and other apps and content, then moving to a different platform becomes more inconvenient.”

The capabilities of smartphones continue to increase, further distancing their functionality from other mobile phones and enabling the creation of a broadening set of applications.

Canalys estimates that the proportion of smartphones with Wi-Fi rose to 84 percent in Q4, while 83 percent had integrated GPS and 43 percent featured integral keyboards – new highs in every case.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

By Sarah Jacobsson
February 10, 2010

ipadApple could cut iPad prices if the device isn’t selling well, the Wall Street Journal reports.

According to Credit Suisse analyst Bill Shope, who met with Apple executives Sunday night, Apple indicated that it would slash iPad prices if the device didn’t sell enough units. “While it remains to be seen how much traction the iPad gets initially, management noted that it will remain nimble (pricing could change if the company is not attracting as many customers as anticipated),” Shope wrote in a post-meeting note.

The iPad is already priced aggressively, at just $499 for the starting model (16GB, no 3G) — much less than initially expected. Apple is perhaps bolstering itself against the potentially lackluster iPad market — since the announcement of Apple’s wonder-tablet, the iPad has been under constant fire with regard to its name, its lack of a camera and multitasking, and the argument that the iPad is just a giant iPod touch.

Online consumer marketplace Retrevo
reports that the number of people who have heard about the tablet but are uninterested in buying one, has doubled from 26% (before the tablet’s unveiling) to 52%.

The flexibility in pricing is reminiscent of the iPhone’s release in 2007 — when Apple slashed the price of the iPhone by $200 just two months after the phone’s debut.

Also in Shope’s post-meeting note: Despite what some believe, Apple officials don’t think that the iPad is in danger of “cannibalizing” other Apple lines. According to the execs, there is a clear “segmentation of capabilities” that suggests “cannibalization may be less of a concern than most currently believe.”

By remaining flexible on pricing, it might seem as though Apple is prematurely predicting a failure of sorts in its iPad. Of course, we must remember that the iPad is a tablet in a (mostly) tablet-less world. Apple has a history of changing the world with its technologies (think about the MP3 market before the iPod), and perhaps erring on the cautious side is the way Apple does it.





  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

By Tony Bradley
February 5, 2009

SAN FRANCISCO – Fresh off the unveiling of Apple’s iPad tablet PC, we have a whole new batch of tablet rumors–this time regarding a Google Chrome-based tablet device. The Chromium Project, the core behind the development of the Chrome operating system. Has released a number of mockups and early concepts regarding what a Chrome-based tablet PC might be.
isn’t Apple, but next to Apple, Google is arguably the most-qualified to launch a tablet device capable of being a game changer. One thing that Apple and Google have in common is that they tend to think outside of the mainstream and are capable of creating paradigm-shifting innovation.
After all of the hype, rumors, and speculation, the Apple iPad is really more of a giant iPod Touch than a full computer. While some tablets, like the HP Slate unveiled by Steve Ballmer at the 2010 International Consumer Electronics Show (CES), operate on Windows 7 or some other desktop operating system, the iPad runs the iPhone mobile operating system rather than Apple’s Mac OS X.

An “iPhone on steroids”, as many have dubbed it, may not seem very compelling, but the reality is that the iPad looks to be a very capable device for what its designed to do. The fact that it runs the vast library of apps available in the iTunes App Store gives users tens of thousands of free and cheap programs to choose from, and developers will soon create new apps uniquely suited for the iPad form factor.

Based on the early conceptual ideas regarding the Chrome tablet, Google may be taking a completely different, yet equally innovative, approach to the tablet PC. Whereas the Apple iPad revolves around apps–similar to the popular iPhone and iPod Touch devices, the Chrome tablet takes a Web-based doc, or file-centric approach.

The very concept of the Chrome OS revolves around creating a Web-centric operating system that sheds all of the excess weight and frivolous features of standard desktop operating system, and provides a streamlined Web browser interface that enables users to interact with Web-based services like Google Docs, Gmail, Picassa, etc.

The tablet PC page on the Chromium site has a variety of mock photos depicting what a Chrome-based tablet might look like. It also lists some of the design elements currently under consideration:

•Keyboard interaction with the screen: anchored, split, attached to focus.

•Launchers as an overlay, providing touch or search as means to access web sites.

•Contextual actions triggered via dwell.

•Zooming UI for multiple tabs

•Tabs presented along the side of the screen

•Creating multiple browsers on screen using a launcher

Aesthetics and user interface aside, a Chrome OS tablet may make a better business tool than the Apple iPad for a few reasons. First, many businesses have existing Web-based tools and applications. A tablet that works seamlessly with the Web would be a more natural extension of existing business tools than a tablet PC centered around iPhone apps.

The nature of Google Docs, Gmail, Google Wave, and other tools from Google allow for seamless synchronization between the tablet, the desktop, the mobile phone, and any other platform because the tools and the data reside online.

The fact that the applications and data are Web-based also makes it easier to share data with other users and collaborate–in real-time, or not–with peers, partners, or customers.

Finally, the Chrome operating system is open-source which enables businesses to freely customize it to fit their needs, or develop tools for it that integrate with other systems and improve business processes. Further, they can deploy those tools without having to get approval from Google, and without having to make them available to the general public in the app store.

Don’t get me wrong, the iPad actually has way more business potential than many give it credit for. Once it arrives, I have faith that new tools will continue to be developed to enhance its business functionality even farther. And, let’s face it, the iPad has been officially announced and will be available soon while the Chrome tablet is pure speculation, so the iPad wins in that department as well.

Whether or not the Chrome tablet ends up being a better business tool than the iPad will remain to be seen, if and when a Chrome-based tablet actually exists.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

By Bill Snyder
February 4, 2009

SAN FRANCISCO – Apple has made a bone-head play that damages the iPad’s potential for business. But, Microsoft, believe it or not, could come to the rescue. Here’s why:

Apple put iWork–not a great tool to begin with–on the iPad. It’s better than nothing, but while iWork can read Microsoft Office formats, it can’t be set to save DOC files by default. What a mistake. While Apple’s home and student customers may be fine with this annoying limitation, business users can’t be endlessly exporting documents to share with colleagues and customers. Unless Apple makes this important change to iWork on the iPad, the forthcoming tablet will be a good device to view written content, but will fall flat when it comes to creating it.

But suppose Microsoft (hold the boos, please) decided there was money to be made here, and created a version of Office for the tablet? Given the relative lack of storage and so on, iPad Office couldn’t be full-featured, but since most of us only use a fraction of Office’s capabilities, that wouldn’t be a show stopper. In fact, we’d have a device that would be useful for small business, and would probably cut deeply into sales of netbooks.

Apple has some additional work to do as well. If the iPad is to become the super-light computing device of choice, it has to support a full-featured browser, and that means supporting Flash. Whether Apple likes it or not, Flash is ubiquitous, and going to a Web site and getting that annoying error message and chunk of blank screen is a bummer.

Google Docs and ZOHO: Online But Not Offline

Am I serious about Microsoft stepping in? Yes, it would be a great idea, and it would make money for Microsoft. But I’d be surprised if Ballmer & Co. had the imagination to make that move. So, I don’t expect it to happen, at least not immediately.

But there are alternatives, albeit limited, you can likely use as soon as the iPad hits the stores.

Google Docs would probably run fairly well on the iPad, but there are two caveats. The first has to do with screen real estate, the second with Google Gears.

When the iPad is in the editing or writing mode, a virtual keyboard pops up, making it hard to see the tools you need to write and edit a document. You might be able to work around this issue, but it would certainly slow you down.

More serious, I think, is the lack of support for Google Gears, which is necessary to run Google docs offline. Without that capability, there’s no way to work on documents on an airplane, for example, which is a mighty big downside. When Google and the somewhat similar ZOHO are used offline, they can later be synched with the cloud versions, ensuring that you have the current versions of your documents. (Thanks to Harry McCracken of Technologizer for mentioning these points to me.)

ZOHO also needs Google gears to work offline. However, since the Safari browser already supports parts of the developing HTML 5 standard, it shouldn’t be too long until ZOHO, and likely Google, will work offline on the iPad, says Raju Vegesna, ZOHO’s chief evangelist.
HTML 5 is expected to reduce or even eliminate the need for the many of the plugins needed today by browsers. Indeed, HTML 5, which is strongly backed by Apple, should ultimately make the Flash-support issue disappear, Vegesna says. But how long that will take is unclear.

QuickOffice and Roambi Could Help

Then there’s QuickOffice, a nifty little app that runs on the iPhone and a number of its competitors. It gives basic editing capabilities to use with Word and Excel documents, and allows you to view (but not edit) PowerPoints.

Clearly, that’s not the way you want to work all the time, but I find QuickOffice helpful even when used on the small iPhone screen. It should be quite a bit better after the company tweaks its app to take advantage of the comparatively huge iPad. That should happen by the time the tablet reaches consumers, the company told me on Monday.

Roambi produces colorful charts and graphs from your spreadsheets and business intelligence reports, making complex data readable on the small iPhone screen, so it should work on the iPad. The processing occurs on Roambi’s secure server. Like QuickOffice, it is available from the iTunes app store.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

By Jeff Bertoluci
January 29, 2009

SAN FRANCISCO – Apple‘s chosen name for its new tablet device–iPad–is drawing sneers and jeers from the blogosphere, mostly from female pundits. Is this a Venus vs. Mars issue? Perhaps in the male mind, “iPad” conjures up images of a sleek, slate-like device. Women, however, may focus on feminine hygiene products.

“Did Apple really check whether women would like the idea of a maxi-pad?” writes blogger Ann Althouse, who suggests that Steve Jobs’ marketing gurus should’ve consulted women a bit more. “Anyway, for our light days, we have iPhones. For our heavy days, we have the iPad? The iMaxiPad? Come on, guys!

Seattle Post-Intelligencer writer Mónica Guzmán also wonders what Apple was thinking: “Whether we make this part of the conversation surrounding Apple’s highly anticipated tablet device or ignore it for the sake of decency, the word ‘pad’ has a meaning that is about as far removed from computing as a Band-Aid is from a television set.

“But how many times do you say ‘Hand me that pad’ and not, you know, blush a little?” Guzmán asks rhetorically.

Interestingly, the “iPad” jokes began before today’s product launch. “Am I the only one who thinks the iPad sounds like a new feminine hygiene tech product?” asked one reader last week on Neowin.net, a tech news site.

iTampon on Twitter

A mere two hours after Jobs wrapped up his iPad demo, the term “iTampon” was trending higher than “Apple’s iPad,” on Twitter. The jokes were, uh, flowing.

User “britpixie” tweeted: “gotta love that iTampon is trending higher than iPad on twitter right now. Something tells me, they picked the wrong name?”

MaestroMasadeJr” added: “iPad will forever be known as the iTampon …oh dear I wonder which unfortunate ad agency advised Apple on the ‘iPad’ name…”

MadTV Skit

I’m guessing that Apple didn’t view this hilarious Mad TV skit from 2007, in which Apple develops a high-tech feminine hygiene product. Yep, the iPad:

Will the name “iPad” ruin the tablet’s chances of success? It’s unlikely. Once the jokes die down, consumers will focus on the tablet’s capabilities and price, although the iTampon quips may never go away entirely.

What’s interesting here is how Apple, usually a master of marketing, seems to have stumbled badly with the tablet’s name. Did the Apple dudes seek the advice of women before choosing “iPad”?

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Subscribe E-Newsletter

Don't get left behind. Sign up to receive the latest news.

Our Sponsors
Kerio
Ozaki
redwood
Super Micro
Kaspersky
KOSS
Xitrix
ArcusIT
Emerson
Copylandia
Piso Cloud
ePLDT
Bitdefender
Multi-Color
Chikka
Smart
Peplink
Sophos
Astaro
itproasia
MEC
APC
wsi
 
 
 
PC World Magazine Subscription
subscribe now
Web Design