PC World Philippines » FaceBook

New Facebook phishing attack “In the wild” warns Kaspersky Lab

Fei — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:00:52 +0000

February 8, 2012

Kaspersky Lab, a leading developer of secure content and threat management solutions is warning Facebook users of a new form of phishing which, tries to steal not just their Facebook credentials but also their credit cards information.

“This Facebook phishing attack is pretty interesting because it does not just try to trick the victim into visiting a phishing website,” says Kaspersky Lab security expert David Jacoby.

“It will reuse the stolen information and login to the compromised account and change both profile picture and name. The profile picture will be changed to the Facebook logo and the name will be translated to “Facebook Security” but containing special ASCII characters replacing letters such as “a” “k” “S” and “t”,” Jacoby explained.

Once an account is compromised it will also send out a message to all contacts of the compromised account. The message looks like this:

“Last Warning: Your Facebook account will be turned off Because someone has reported you. Please do re-confirm your account security by: => http://apps-xxxx-xxxxx-user.de.vu
Thank you. The Facebook Team”/

When a victim clicks on the link, he will be redirected to a website that looks and feels like Facebook’s own website. The fake Facebook site then asks the victim to provide personal information such as name, email address, password, webmail system, among others.

When submitting this form, the details will be sent to the attacker who can automatically login to your Facebook account and compromise it.

After filling up these details, the victim will be asked for final identity confirmation with a payment and by having the person give his or her credit card information.

Jacoby advises Facebook users to be aware of such threats to avoid becoming victims.

“These scams are just getting more popular and we really recommend not giving out personal information, especially not email, password and credit card information over social media. It is also recommended that you contact your security vendor and the social media vendor if you encounter these sites,” he said.

Facebook may let you share what you do off-site

Fei — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:59:13 +0000

By Sharon Gaudin
January 20, 2012

FRAMINGHAM – Speculation is swirling that Facebook is getting ready to announce a way to combine information on what users do on, and off, the social network.

News reports began surfacing that Facebook planned a press conference for Wednesday evening in San Francisco. Last fall, the social network announced that it was working on what it called Open Graph applications, designed to enable people to share on http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9157638/Facebook_Complete_coverage what they are doing elsewhere online.

The applications began rolling out over the past few months to Web sites like the Washington Post and Hulu, according to a report Tuesday from All Things D.

The applications are expected to enable users to share what they’re doing on other Web sites – listening to music, reading an article or watching a video – with their Facebook friends. They also may be able to invite their friends to join them, according to All Things D.

Facebook declined to comment on what Wednesday’s news will entail.

“I think this falls under the ‘this is the kind of thing you will like if you like this kind of thing,’ ” said Ezra Gottheil, an analyst with Technology Business Research. “I believe, however, that part of Facebook’s user base will shut off all permissions in response to this reduction in privacy. Of course, all they’re doing is providing the enabling technology, but I don’t think it’s a net win for them.”

He added that he doesn’t think most of Facebook’s users will want to share this much information.

“It assumes that you want all your friends, close and distant, to know what you read, where you shop, what songs you listen to,” said Gottheil. “I think Facebook has expanded far beyond its 20-something core, and most older people will be put off … There has been resistance to Facebook’s other incursions on privacy. To me, it is one of the recurring reminders that with respect to my desire for control over what I share with others, Facebook either does not get it or does not care.”

Last November, Facebook took a very public privacy hit when it settled charges by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission the social network deceived users and shared information that it had promised would be kept private.

Industry watchers are waiting to see how Facebook handles the privacy issues that will surround the Open Graph applications.

Facebook chat-based phishing attack impersonates Facebook Security

Fei — Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:59:32 +0000

By Lucian Constantin
January 16, 2012

IASI, ROMANIA – A new phishing attack that’s spreading through Facebook chat modifies hijacked accounts in order to impersonate the social network’s security team.

The attackers replace the profile picture of compromised accounts with the Facebook logo and change their names to a variation of “Facebook Security” written with special Unicode characters, said Kaspersky Lab expert David Jacoby in a blog post.

Facebook claims that changing the profile name can take up to 24 hours and is subject to confirmation. However, in Jacoby’s tests the change occurred almost instantly and required only the password. This was also confirmed by a victim whose profile name was modified within 5 minutes of their account being compromised, he said.

After the victim’s profile name and picture get changed, the attackers send out a chat message to all of their contacts informing them that their accounts will be suspended unless they re-confirm their information.

The rogue messages appear to be signed by “The Facebook Team” and contain a link to a phishing page hosted on an external domain. The Web page mimics Facebook’s design and asks for name, email, password, security question, country, birth date and other information needed to hijack the account.

However, the attack doesn’t stop there. According to Jacoby, a second form asks users for their credit card details and billing address. This is somewhat unusual for Facebook phishing attacks, the majority of which target only social networking account information.

“These scams are just getting more popular and we really recommend not giving out personal information, especially not email, password and credit card information over social media,” Jacoby said.

Facebook brings back the hack

Fei — Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:59:59 +0000

By Joab Jackson
January 6, 2012

NEW YORK – In an effort to challenge programmers worldwide, Facebook has brought back its Hacker Cup contest for a third round, the company announced Wednesday.

“Hacking is core to how we build at Facebook,” wrote Facebook mobile engineer David Alves in a blog post announcing the contest. Company engineers are “always hacking to find better ways to solve problems,” he said.

Facebook is using the original definition of “hacker,” referring not to someone who breaks into computer systems, but rather to an individual who “enjoys exploring the details of programmable systems and how to stretch their capabilities,” to borrow the definition from the canonical online computer slang dictionary The Jargon File.

The first four rounds of the contest will be held online, starting Jan. 28. The top 25 finalists will be flown to Facebook’s headquarters on March 27 for a final round. The winner will be awarded US$5,000, and three runners-up will be awarded cash prizes as well.

The contest consists of successive sets of increasingly difficult algorithmic problems. Scoring will be based on how accurately and quickly the programmers complete the puzzles. Last year’s contest featured challenges such as determining the optimum number of shield generators and warriors one should acquire for the Facebook game Starcraft II and calculating the best race car driving strategy given a variable number of opponents, race track curves and likelihood of crashing.

For each problem, the participant is given a set of inputs and an explanation of the problem. They have six minutes to submit an answer, along with the source code used to solve the problem. Participants can use any programming language, as well as language-extending libraries and even complete programs, such as a spreadsheet.

Last year’s Hacker Cup got off to a rough start. Some users on the Quora social networking site complained that the contest’s procedures were confusing and sometimes contradictory. The social networking giant had improved the process by the end of the contest, though, participants reported.

Facebook Adds Timeline to iPhone App

Fei — Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:00:15 +0000

By David Daw
December 21, 2011

SAN FRANCISCO – Facebook now lets iPhone owners view its new Timeline layout and has added several extra handy features in an app update pushed out to iPhone users on Sunday. iPad users still can’t view Facebook Timeline layouts.

Facebook launched its updated Android apps last week when Timeline was released. Facebook has already updated its Android mobile app with the layout. It’s unclear why the iOS update was delayed until the weekend but possibilities include waiting for approval from Apple’s app store and bug fixes. The Timeline layout was shown earlier this year at the company’s f8 Conference.

Timeline however isn’t the only new feature added in 4.1. The new version of Facebook’s app brings a lot of the new features that the social networking giant added over the last year to its mobile apps.

You now have the ability to add and sort into Facebook’s lists feature to help them organize their friends. It also adds the subscribe to page feature that the company added along with it’s revamp of news feed. And, as originally reported byTechcrunch, the new app felt considerably faster than previous versions during my time with the app.

This new iOS update leaves only the company’s iPad app without the new Timeline layout. Facebook promised that an update for Apple’s popular tablet is on the way.

Facebook’s URL scanner is vulnerable to cloaking attacks

Fei — Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:59:44 +0000

By Lucian Constantin
October 10, 2011

IASI, ROMANIA – Members of a hacking think-tank called Blackhat Academy claim that Facebook’s URL scanning systems can be tricked into thinking malicious pages are clean by using simple content cloaking techniques.

Such attacks involve Web pages filtering out requests that come from specific clients and feeding them content that is different from what is displayed to regular users.

Attackers have been using this method to poison search results on Google for years now by serving keyword-filled pages to its indexing robot, but redirecting visitors to malware when they click on the links. However, it turns out that Facebook is also vulnerable to this type of content forging. “Hatter,” one of the Blackhat Academy members, provided a live demonstration, which involved posting the URL to a JPEG file on a wall.

Facebook crawled the URL and added a thumbnail image to the wall post, however, clicking on its corresponding link actually redirected users to YouTube. This happened because the destination page was able to identify Facebook’s original request and served a JPEG file.

“While most major sites that allow link submission are vulnerable to this method, sites including Websense, Google+ and Facebook make the requests easily identifiable,” the Blackhat Academy hackers said.

“These sites send an initial request to the link in order to store a mirror thumbnail of the image, or a snapshot of the website being linked to. In doing so, many use a custom user agent, or have IP addresses that resolve to a consistent domain name,” they explained.

Earlier this week, Facebook signed a partnership with Websense to use the security vendor’s cloud-based, real-time Web scanner for malicious URL detection. Blackhat Academy has now provided proof-of-concept code, which, according to its advisory, can be used to bypass it.

Websense doesn’t believe that to be the case. “This is nothing new. We use numerous methodologies and systems to ensure that our analysis of content (in real time) is not manipulated by malware authors, including using IP addresses not attributable to Websense so that malware authors are unaware that it is Websense analyzing the content,” the company said.

“Also, the Websense ThreatSeeker Network is fed via an opt-in feedback loop from tens of thousands of customers distributed globally. These IPs are also not attributable to Websense.com. It is because of technologies like this that Facebook chose Websense to provide protection for their growing user base of more than 750 million users,” it added.

That could well be true, but it’s worth keeping in mind that Websense primarily sells security solutions to businesses and Facebook is usually blocked on many corporate networks. It would be logical to assume that relying on its customers’ appliances to scan URLs on the social networking website might not have an immediate impact.

Hatter says that as a security research outfit Blackhat Academy follows responsible disclosure and notified Facebook of the content cloaking issue at the end of July. Despite this, the method still works.

“We’re well aware of the content forgery technique described and have built protections into our systems to account for it,” a Facebook spokesman said via email.

“The content returned when we crawl a shared link is only one of many signals we use to combat spam and abuse on Facebook. We know that this content can change between visits, and therefore can’t always be trusted, and our systems account for that,” he added.

Earlier this year, Facebook signed a partnership with Web of Trust (WOT), an organization that maintains a community-driven spam URL block list. However, it’s well-known that blacklisting is not very efficient and there can be a significant window of exposure between the time when a URL starts being spammed and the time when it’s flagged by such a system.

At the very least, content cloaking can be a powerful social engineering technique. A link with a .jpg termination accompanied by a thumbnail can look harmless enough to trick a lot of users into clicking on it.

Facebook and Websense are not the only ones with this problem. Google+ and Digg are also vulnerable to cloaking attacks, but other sites such as Twitter have developed strong protections against them.

App Protects Facebook Users from Malicious Links

Fei — Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:59:40 +0000

By John P. Mello Jr.
September 29, 2011
SAN FRANCISCO – “Security” isn’t usually linked with “fun,” but a Finnish security is taking a stab at connecting the two with its new application. F-Secure’s ShareSafe app runs inside Facebook and flags links to dangerous websites before you post them to your friends’ walls (or your own).

“Security applications and Facebook tend to mix together like oil and water,” Sean Sullivan writes in an F-Secure blog post. “Folks generally want to share when they’re online–and not to worry about security.”
For this reason, ShareSafe’s development team has designed the app to be entertaining, with security benefits “tagging along for the ride,” Sullivan adds.

Indeed, the security feature of the app does take up very little of the offering’s screen real estate. It’s just a form field that occupies the top of the app’s home screen. You can paste a link in the form and ShareSafe will tell you if there is any unsafe content at the other end of the web address.

This can be especially useful if you’re dealing with shortened URLs, since their destinations usually can’t be guessed just by looking at the characters in the address.

The rest of ShareSafe’s interface page is made up of a dashboard and a feed of top links.

From the dashboard, you can keep tabs on badges and rewards you’ve earned (you get a “Rookie Cookie” badge just for activating the app), as well as notifications. The app awards reward points for sharing safe links, for clicks and “likes” generated by those links, and, of course, for the number of friends you get to join the ShareSafe community. Points are also awarded for other behaviors, but the exact details are secret to “keep things interesting,” F-Secure explains.

Points can then be redeemed for products. Right now, prizes are limited to security software made by F-Secure, but perhaps we’ll see a wider selection in the future.

From the links feed, you can see top links for all of Facebook. You can also choose a category and see the top links for that category–such as pictures, news, or health. A “top link” is determined by the number of Facebook “likes” it has received.

Why Share Safely?

Why would you want to view your news feed and wall items through ShareSafe? Because before ShareSafe displays any items with links, it checks the links for malicious content. This way, you can make sure neither you nor any of your friends are circulating URLs to poisoned sites.
According to security experts, poisoned links on social networks are a big problem. In an experiment by Dasient Security, researchers set up accounts on 11 social networks and found that not one of those networks stopped them from posting malware links. In addition, nine of the 11 links failed to block links listed in a Google compilation of poisoned websites.

“The social networks we tested have some work to do on their malware countermeasures,” says Neil Daswani, Dasient CTO.

According to Carole Theriault, a senior consultant at security firm Sophos, “Facebook is a very enticing playground for bad guys. It is no surprise that surveys have shown an increase in malware activity on the site.”

Another Facebook User Revolt on the Horizon? Of Course!

Fei — Sun, 25 Sep 2011 23:00:48 +0000

By Eric Mack
September 26, 2011

SAN FRANCISCO – How will Facebook users react to the huge changes soon to land at the world’s largest social network? Anecdotal evidence suggests, not well. According to a number of informal poles, four out of five Facebook users see the upcoming facelift and new features as unpopular.

We know Facebook users are adverse to change. Just this week an anti-change Facebook campaign sprang up within hours of Facebook unveiling changes to its news feed. Now, with Thursday’s f8 conference keynote by Mark Zuckerberg where he announced sweeping changes over how your Facebook profile will look and a radical new approach to collecting user data, it’s a foregone conclusion some users will be outraged.
Here is quick overview of the changes and some comments from the pitchfork wielding Facebook crowd that is already amassing.

New Features:

o Timeline: A whole suite of changes to user profiles that makes them wider and more visual than before and adds a number of interface and privacy controls. Timeline adds the scrolling ticker of real-time activity from friends that rolled out earlier this week and will also summarize past events in an attempt to tell the full story of users’ lives, as Facebook puts it.

o Media and app integration: Music from Spotify and news from Yahoo (more Facebook integration is already rolling out on the Yahoo News’ site) are among the new “Open Graph” apps that will soon allow for real-time interaction, like listening to the same song at the same time as friends.

o Privacy filters: A new private activity log will provide control over what gets displayed on profiles and what doesn’t.
o Cover photo: A huge banner makes the top of your profile page look more blog-like.

This week’s sneak peek at the tectonic redesign changes coming soon to Facebook has clearly already stirred the pot of social networking discontent.

“What Facebook needs to understand is that every user is different. What Facebook should do is offer the extra options instead of forcing them on us users,” writes PCWorld reader BikDav. “That way, we can choose what we need and what we don’t need.”
Complaints about Facebook’s new features have also provided new ammunition for the ongoing battle with Google+, which just opened its doors to the public this week after a twelve-week closed field test.

“I am seeing nothing but complaining about the new Facebook features on my Google+ page,” observed PCWorld reader stewdanko.

A poll released just hours after the f8 announcements on Thursday by SodaHead, an online community and survey site founded by a former MySpace VP, found 84 percent of over 1400 users surveyed disapproved of Facebook’s facelift.

Web poll

PCWorld’s Facebook page seems like the most likely place to find some words of support for the changes, but our own informal survey returned the same findings. A quick review of over 50 responses to our request for comments on the redesign posted within the first twelve hours following the f8 announcement shows less than 20 percent expressed support for the new Facebook. The word “sucks” dominated the conversation and the merits of Google+ were widely espoused.

“Organized chaos or shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic. I pick the latter. It’s not working for me,” comments Heather Carey on the PCWorld Facebook page.

A handful of people that responded to our request said they were excited about the new features, and others didn’t understand what has so many people in a tizzy.

“Really don’t get why everyone’s complaining,” wrote Ted Geistlinger in the comment stream. “In the end it’ll be for the best. I don’t feel sorry for people who are complaining that the free service that they aren’t obligated to use is making minorly inconveniencing changes.”

Such complaints are a familiar refrain, one that was heard years ago when Facebook introduced the idea of status updates, and when that was expanded to the News Feed. Today, both concepts are part of the daily lives of almost one-sixth of humanity. Will we all come around to the new Facebook? Or is the social network sinking under its own weight? What do you think?

Video Chatting for Newbies

Fei — Sun, 07 Aug 2011 23:00:38 +0000

By Sarah Jacobsson Purewal
August 8, 2011

SAN FRANCISCO – Video chat is all the rage these days, thanks to new services such as Google+ Hangouts and Skype/Facebook integrated video chat. Video chatting is a great way to stay in touch with family and friends–seeing loved ones’ faces on a computer screen is almost like actually being there.

If you’re a video-chat newbie, shopping for webcams and setting up video calls can be a daunting process. Luckily, it isn’t as hard as you think it is. Here’s how to get started with video chat. You’ll be reconnecting with relatives and pals in no time.

Choose a Webcam

These days most laptops–and a lot of desktop monitors–come with built-in webcams. Before you rush out and buy a webcam, confirm whether your laptop or desktop monitor already has one.

When you’re out webcam shopping, consider the following specs.

1. Resolution: Picture resolution is measured in megapixels–more megapixels is typically better. Built-in webcams are usually 1.3 megapixels, which is okay but not great. Look for a webcam that has 2 or 3 megapixels; having anything more than 3 megapixels probably won’t make much of a difference when it comes to video chat.

2. Speed: Video is measured in frames per second, a figure also known as the frame rate. You’ll want a webcam that captures 30-plus frames per second for smooth video–though the actual smoothness of the video will depend on a number of factors, including the speed of your Internet connection.

3. Lens: Entry-level webcams typically have plastic lenses, but a webcam with a glass lens is a better choice. It’s also nice to have a webcam with a manual focus ring, so you can adjust the webcam yourself.

4. Connection point: You’ll come across both USB-wired webcams and wireless (Bluetooth or Wi-Fi) webcams. Of the two types, USB 2.0 is the more reliable choice, in my opinion, because you’ll get a steady connection and you won’t have to worry about your Wi-Fi cutting out (this is good if you’re, say, recording video). You should also consider the type of stand a webcam has. If you plan to use the webcam on a thin monitor or a laptop screen, you’ll want a clip-style stand. If you have a larger monitor, or if you want to put the webcam on a shelf or desk, you’ll need a flat stand.

5. HD: If you wish to use your webcam just for video chatting and socializing, you don’t really need an HD webcam. But if you intend to do a lot of streaming or recording–you have a Stickam show, for instance, or you want to make YouTube video logs–you might consider an HD model. The “HD” label refers to webcams that capture images of 720p or better.

Webcams can cost anywhere from $10 to $300–but if you’re paying more than $30, you’d better know what you’re getting.

Set Up Your Webcam

Setting up a webcam should be pretty straightforward, but here are a few tips to ensure a trouble-free setup.

1. Plug the webcam in: If your webcam doesn’t plug in (it’s a wireless- or Bluetooth-enabled model), turn it on and make sure your computer recognizes it as a webcam. If you can’t tell whether your computer is recognizing the webcam, go to Cameroid and click Snap; if your computer recognizes your webcam, you’ll get an Adobe Flash window that requests camera and microphone access. Click Allow, and check for a picture.

2. Download and install the latest drivers: Verify that you have the latest drivers for your webcam by going to the webcam’s manufacturer’s website. You may not need to do this if your webcam is a plug-and-play USB device. Also be sure to download and install the latest version of Adobe Flash, if you plan on using a Flash-based video-chat service (such as Google Talk).

3. Lighting, lighting, lighting: Webcam image quality isn’t great, but that doesn’t mean it has to be terrible. To get some decent lighting, follow a few rules. Don’t use your computer monitor as a source of light, and don’t put a light behind you (your face will just look dark). Instead, position a source of light (such as a desk lamp) in front of you or beside you. Soften the light by taping a piece of white paper over the bulb–this will make you look less orange and oversaturated.

4. Wear white: Many webcams have automatic exposure and white balance. Basically, that means the webcam will focus on the brightest thing in the picture and assume that it is white, adjusting its picture accordingly. You need to put something that’s actually white in the picture, or your webcam will focus on something that isn’t white–and your picture will end up looking all weird. You can either wear a white shirt or constantly hold up a piece of white paper (your choice).

For more tips on how to perfect your webcam video, check out photography blogger Strobist’s post on getting a good picture.
Next page: Selecting a service, and video chatting by phone

Select a Service

You can find tons of video-chat services out there. Which one you decide to use depends on a number of factors, including what you want to do with it and what services you’re comfortable using. Most major instant messenger services–including AOL Instant Messenger, Facebook, Google Talk, and Skype–have video-chat support. If you already use one of these services regularly, you should probably just stick with it. Otherwise, read on.

Google Talk

Google Talk, the chat service located inside Google’s Web programs (such as Gmail and Google+), has had video-chat support since late 2008. To use Google Talk’s video service, you must first install the voice-and-video chat software. Once the software is installed, video chatting with your Gmail contacts is simple.

Get started: To begin a video-chat session, open a chat window as you normally would, by double-clicking on your friend’s name in the chat list, or by hovering over your friend’s name and selecting Chat. Once the chat window is open, a little video icon will appear in the top-left corner of the window. Click that icon to start a video call.

Either you or your friend (or both) must have a webcam in order to video chat (this should be obvious). If your friend has a webcam plugged in, a small camera icon will appear next to their name in your chat list. Also, both of you must be online–if one of you is “invisible,” you won’t be able to video chat.

Add a contact: If you want to video chat with someone who isn’t on your contact list, simply add that person as a contact for Gmail chat. At the top of the chat window is a box where you can ‘Search, add, or invite’ a friend. Type in your pal’s email address, and then click Invite to chat.

Adjust the video: Google uses Flash video, which means you can do little in the way of adjusting your webcam directly from your chat window. If for some reason you can’t see video, right-click the video window and choose Settings. Confirm that you’ve allowed Google to access your camera and microphone (the icon looks like a computer with an eye inside it). Next, verify that you’ve chosen the correct webcam–go to the icon with the webcam on it, and find your camera in the drop-down menu.

If you’re a member of Google+, you can use Google’s messenger service to broadcast your webcam in a Google+ Hangout. To start a Google+ Hangout, go to your Google+ homepage and click Start a Hangout on the right side. Hangouts can hold up to ten people video chatting simultaneously in the same room.

You should use Google Talk if you have a lot of Gmail contacts, you want to talk to multiple friends at once (using Google+), or you don’t want to download and open a separate program.

Skype

Skype is practically synonymous with “video chat.” This instant messenger program lets users make both video calls and regular calls straight from their desktop.

Get started: Since Skype isn’t browser-based, you have to download and install the Skype desktop client. Then you need to obtain a username, if you don’t already have one. Creating an account is pretty simple: Just click Don’t have a Skype Name? and go through the steps.

Once you have a Skype name, you can log in and start chatting right away. To start a video chat, click on the friend you want to chat with, and then click the Video Call button.

Add a contact: You can easily add a contact in Skype. Go to Contacts, New Contact and search for your friend by their email address, Skype username, or full name. You can also search your Microsoft Outlook and Yahoo email address books by going to Contacts, Import Contacts.

Adjust the video: One nice thing about Skype’s desktop client is that it allows you to adjust your webcam’s settings for a better picture. Go to Tools, Options, Video settings, and you’ll see some basic options, including a feature for taking a snapshot with your webcam. To make further tweaks, go to Webcam settings. In that window, you can adjust brightness, contrast, gamma, hue, saturation, sharpness, image quality, white balance, and flicker. You can also choose whether to mirror or flip the image, or to go black and white. These settings will carry over to the next time you use your webcam, too, so if you want to change your webcam settings for Google chat, here’s where to do it.

You should use Skype if you like tweaking your webcam settings, you want only a video-chatting service, and you plan to call landlines or cell phones on occasion.

Facebook

Recently Facebook introduced its very own in-browser video-calling service in conjunction with Skype. The service hasn’t rolled out to all users yet, however; the current status of the rollout on Facebook’s video-calling page states: “Video calling will be available soon. Please check back later.”
Get started: Facebook video calling is a lot like Google video chat. Before your first video chat, you’ll need to download and install some software, but all of your chatting will be in-browser.

To video call one of your friends, choose the person from your Facebook chat list on the right side of the browser, and open a chat window by clicking on the person’s name. In the upper-right corner of the chat window, a small video camera icon will appear; click this icon to initiate a video call.

You can also start video calls by visiting your friend’s Facebook page and clicking the Call icon that appears in the top right. Only one person needs to have a webcam for friends to use Facebook video chat.

If your friend doesn’t pick up when you call, Facebook lets you leave a “video voicemail” message: You can record a quick video that they’ll receive in their inbox the next time they log in.

Facebook video calling is supported in Firefox, Chrome, and Safari, but not in Opera. It does not work on Linux.
Add a contact: Adding a Facebook video-chat contact is the same as adding a regular Facebook contact–you have to “friend” the person (and they have to accept) before you can start chatting or video chatting with them.

You should use Facebook video chat if you have the option (it hasn’t arrived for all users yet) and if the people you want to talk to are on Facebook.

Video Chat on Your Phone

Now that you’re a video-chat connoisseur, you can take it on the road. How can you video chat while you’re mobile–say, on a cell phone? Plenty of services will let you let you do just that; Tango, for one, allows you to video chat with users on other platforms. One thing you may want to have, however, is a phone with a front-facing camera–although you can video chat using a phone’s back-facing camera, it’s a bit inconvenient.

Here are two video-chat services that you can use on your phone.

FaceTime

If you own an iPhone 4, an iPod Touch, or an iPad 2, you can use Apple’s built-in video-chat service, FaceTime.
Using FaceTime is simple: Find the person you want to video chat with in your contacts list, and tap the FaceTime button. Or, if you’re on a call with someone, tap the FaceTime button on the call screen. FaceTime by default utilizes your device’s front-facing camera, but you can also tap the switch button to use the back camera.

The only real problem with FaceTime is that you must be on Wi-Fi–not 3G–to use it. But you do have ways to get around that constraint–with a little jailbreaking.
Tango

If you don’t have an iOS device, or if you own an iOS device and you want to make video calls over 3G or 4G without having to jailbreak it, you can check out Tango. A cross-platform mobile video-chat service, Tango works on both iOS devices and Android phones.

Tango is quick and easy to set up–all you need is your name and your contact list, and you can start calling right away. For you to call someone through Tango, the other person also needs to have the app installed. You can invite friends via text or email, straight from the Tango app.

Aside from the ability to video chat over a data connection, one particularly appealing feature of Tango is the ability to switch between video and audio during the call.

See? Video chatting isn’t nearly as scary as it seems. You can do it from virtually anywhere, too. Now you have no excuse to avoid calling your mother and letting her see your face.

Facebook Should Focus On Product, Not Hiding Google+

Fei — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:59:22 +0000

By Paul Suarez
July 19, 2011

SAN FRANCISCO – Facebook should focus on continuing to deliver a solid product rather than worrying about ads on its site that promote rival social networking service Google+.

According to International Business Times, Facebook removed a user-created ad that invited people to connect with its creator on Google+. Web developer Michael Lee Johnson suggested anyone “lucky enough” to be in Google’s field trial should add him to his or her circles — before the ad was pulled.
Facebook ads allow any user of the site to create advertisements that target people based on location, age and interests for fairly reasonable rates. But its advertising guidelines say it can remove an ad for any reason, including if it promotes a competing product or negatively affects Facebook’s business or relationship with its users.
It appears that Google+ is a beast that Facebook can’t ignore.

The new service, which is still in a field trial, has already attracted 10 million users and will likely become a force to be reckoned with. It’s no surprise that Facebook’s war against the service just got a little heated.
Has the social network really sunk low enough to eliminate what is essentially a paid plea for networking from its site just because it mentions an up-and-coming rival service?

It would seem that Facebook is on edge because of Google+’s success and wants to do everything it can to retain its massive base of users.

While it had the right to remove the ad, Facebook’s action just makes the company look weak and unconfident. At this point in the game, Facebook, with 700 million plus users, has no reason to have either one of those character traits.