This text is replaced by the Flash movie.
 

Posts Tagged ‘ Adobe Flash ’

By Joseph Fieber
November 11, 2011

SAN FRANCISCO – Despite recently saying that Flash was “critical” for mobile communication, Adobe today announced it will no longer continue to develop Flash for mobile devices. For some, the writing has been on the wall since Steve Jobs banned Flash from the iPhone and iPad saying Apple “won’t support Flash because it is so buggy” and that it consumes too much power. Now, there is no doubt that Flash is a dying platform.

Does your businesses website, like 85 percent of popular websites, include Flash? What will you use when Flash is gone?

Why Flash was Popular

Adobe’s Flash was, and still is, one of the most popular platforms on the Web. Its capability to contain images, audio and video made it well suited for many needs. More importantly, the tools to develop Flash were easy for designers to use. “Build it and they will come” applies here; developers wrote their websites, applications, widgets, and anything else they could in Flash, and people installed the plugins and readers required to consume it.

Why Flash is Dying

The first strike against Flash was when Apple decided it wouldn’t include or support it on the iPhone. The argument was that it wasn’t properly optimized for mobile devices, and used too much valuable battery life. Apple also didn’t pre-install Flash on the Macbook Air, which increaseditsbatterylifebytwohours. Strike two was when Microsoft announced that its Windows 8 MetrointerfacewillbeHTML5-based, and won’t support plugins like Flash. Strike three is todaysannouncement by Adobe that though it will still support Flash for certain desktop applications, it will no longer support it for “new mobile device configurations”.
What Will Replace Flash?

If you hadn’t already started evaluating going “Flashless” on your business website, now is a good time to start. Thankfully, the successor to Flash is apparent. Though there are less popular and less capable options available, HTML5 has garnished the most attention and though still under development, is already being widely adopted. Where Apple refused to support Flash, it has begun to embrace HTML5. Along with being able to handle most anything that Flash could and being non-proprietary, its capability to include application programming interfaces (API)s for complex Web applications makes it a great candidate for accessing cloud-based services from mobile devices.

Welcome Adobe Edge

Adobe didn’t make this decision overnight; we reported a few months ago about Adobe’s new product called Edge, which uses a similar interface to that of Flash, but “allows designers to bring animated content to websites, using Web standards like HTML5, JavaScript, and CSS3″. Despite HTML5 being an open standard, Adobe wants to control this type of development, and its Edge product, though still only a “preview” version, is the front-runner in this space. Being from the same vendor with a similar interface to that of Flash will certainly make it easier for developers to transition.
Flash won’t die tomorrow; it will still be around for years. Flash developers will still find work maintaining existing Flash-based sites. New development, however, is going to be HTML5-based, and anyone looking to update their Flash-based site would be wise to transition to HTML5. Not only will it make your site available to the growing number of mobile devices, but will prepare it for the upcoming HTML5 developments that could give your site capabilities not yet available on the Web.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Linux tablets, where are you?

By Fei on June 15, 2010

By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
June 15, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO – Apple has long had a history of being arrogant. But, more often than not, they’ve been able to back it up by the quality of their products. But now, with Apple locking out Adobe Flash and Google Ads, not to mention their cute trick of setting up an HTML 5 demo site that only works with Apple’s own Safari Web browser, I think Apple has overstepped their authority. It’s time for Linux-powered smartphones, tablets and devices to give users top-notch alternatives to Apple’s offerings.

Linux, largely thanks to Google Android, has already made progress that way in smartphones. Indeed, even hardcore iPhone users are now thinking about switching to Android phones. There’s also a wave of Linux-powered tablets and would-be iPad rivals on their way. But they’re not here yet.

While I think that these new Linux devices will do well, I also think they need to be more than just tablets that are cheaper and more open than iPads. As Jim Zemlin, the head of the Linux Foundation, wrote in BusinessWeek, “It’s important that open-source products add more value for users than simply being free. Open-source software also needs to be fabulous.”
Exactly.

Zemlin went on to write, “Providing a good user experience isn’t paramount under the white lights of the data center. In consumer electronics, it’s a different story. Mobile Linux vendors must increase their technical investments by working on key open-source projects to make every component used in Linux devices benefit the user experience. That includes making devices boot up faster, connect better, and display graphics more smoothly.”

That’s why I’m encouraged by such moves as Google’s Android team working more closely with the mainstream Linux developers. I’m also really pleased to see that Canonical, the company that makes Ubuntu Linux possible, is now working on enabling touch in Ubuntu, which would make it ideal for tablets.

If any Linux company comes close to appreciating Apple’s appeal to average users with its focus on making the interface a pleasure to use, it’s Canonical. After all, it was Canonical’s founder and Ubuntu’s guiding light, Mark Shuttleworth, who said Ubuntu’s goal was to deliver “a user experience that can compete with Apple in two years.”
Shuttleworth was talking about the desktop. Today, it’s all about competing on devices. The day of the PC is fading into the afternoon. With Apple making enemies of one-time partners and closing its software circle ever tighter, now is the time for Linux not only to push forward with its historical advantages of lower prices and open software and standards, but to show the world that Linux devices can be every bit as attractive and user-friendly as its Apple competition.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

By Chris Byers
April 2, 2010

flash1LONDON – QUESTION I was interested to read recently about someone who upgraded to Windows 7 64bit and could no longer view YouTube content. I am about to take delivery of a new Windows 7 64bit PC. I too want to watch YouTube. Does your advice mean I need to opt for the 32bit version of the operating system instead? Carole Ellis

HELPROOM ANSWER Don’t panic, Carole, you’ll be able to watch YouTube video on your new PC just fine.

The chances are your computer will arrive without Flash installed, but should you visit a Flash-based website such as YouTube, you’ll be invited to install it.

If you’re using Internet Explorer, go to adobe.com and click the ‘Get Adobe Flash Player’ link. The wizard will then talk you though the very simple steps of downloading and installing Flash.

You’ll need to repeat this process in Mozilla Firefox if you also intend to use that web browser, since Firefox and Internet Explorer use different versions of the plug-in.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

By Erik Larkin
February 1, 2009

SAN FRANCISCO – Experts agree that Windows 7 has enhanced security to ward off attacks on vulnerabilities in old software. But what if a money-minded online scammer can persuade you to download malware onto your PC?

“Windows 7 is more secure, and upgrading to it is a big improvement,” says Chester Wisniewski, a senior security advisor with software-maker Sophos. “But it’s not going to stop malware in its tracks.”

Exploits Take a Hit

Digital crooks generally use two tactics to install malware on a PC. Exploits often take the form of a snippet of attack code hidden on a Web page–often a hacked-but-otherwise-benign site. When you browse the page, the exploit hunts for software flaws in Windows or in third-party programs such as Adobe Flash or QuickTime. If it finds one, the exploit may surreptitiously install malware without any hint of the attack.

In contrast, social engineering attacks try to trick you into downloading and installing bot malware that poses as a useful program or video. Some attacks combine tactics, as when a scammer sends an e-mail message encouraging you to open an attached PDF file, only to trigger an exploit buried in the file that then hunts for a flaw in Adobe Reader.

Security upgrades in Windows 7 could help prevent many attacks that target software flaws. ActiveX attacks, once the bane of Internet Explorer users, may “pretty much disappear” due to IE 8′s Protected Mode, says H.D. Moore, chief security officer at Rapid7 and creator of the Metasploit testing tool.

The arcane-sounding Address Space Layer Randomization makes it harder for crooks to find a vulnerability for a running program in your computer’s memory. The related Data Execution Prevention feature attempts to prohibit an attack from taking advantage of any flaw that it may discover.

“These two, in particular, could have a very large impact,” says Wisniewski. Still, though ASLR and DEP were expanded to protect more programs in Windows 7 than in Vista, they don’t cover all applications.

Vista Safer Than XP?

For a sense of what that impact might be, we can look at how Vista fared against malware. Microsoft’s latest Security Intelligence Report covers the first half of 2009, prior to Windows 7′s release. It’s based on data from the Malicious Software Removal Tool, which Microsoft distributes via Automatic Updates to fight common malware infections. According to that data, the infection rate for an up-to-date Vista computer was 62 percent lower than that for an up-to-date XP system.

It’s possible, of course, that Vista users are technologically savvier on average, and so less likely to fall victim to malware. The sample sizes for XP and Vista, which Microsoft didn’t include in the report, might skew the statistics, as well.

But Sophos’s Wisniewski thinks that ASLR and DEP are factors, too. And since those features are expanded in Windows 7, there’s reason to hope they’ll continue to be effective.

“I don’t see this going away anytime soon,” says Moore. He notes that there are plenty of ways crooks can and likely will continue to ply their evil trade against the new OS. But “it does raise the bar,” Moore says.

Hacking People, Not Programs

Exploit-based attacks may be harder to pull off against Windows 7, but social engineering attacks may be as dangerous as ever. And the theoretically less-annoying User Account Control does little to disable poisoned downloads.

In October, Sophos ran a test to see how Windows 7 and UAC would handle malware. First, the testers grabbed the first ten samples of malicious software that came into their lab. They then ran those samples on a fresh Windows 7 machine with UAC at its default settings, and with no antivirus installed.

Two samples couldn’t run on Windows 7 at all. But at its default setting, UAC blocked only one sample, leaving seven pieces of malware that loaded right up.

Sophos’s test highlights two points. First, Wisniewski and others say, UAC isn’t designed to block malware as much as it is to encourage programmers to write software that doesn’t require special privileges–so you shouldn’t count on it for protection.

Second, if a bad guy tricks you into downloading a Trojan horse, ASLR and DEP don’t matter. IE 8′s SmartScreen filter and similar features in other browsers might block known nasties, but the malware universe is bigger than that.

Social engineering ruses include using a hijacked social network account to send malware lures to friends of the owner, sending a link to a supposed video taken of a friend, and hiding a poisoned URL in a shortened link of the type commonly used on Twitter. (For more on such dangers, see “How to Stop 11 Hidden Security Threats.”)

Toss in other tried-and-true scams such as videos that instruct you to in­­stall a codec file (but instead lead you to a malware download), and phony documents attached to e-mail messages that appear to come from coworkers, and it becomes clear why Windows 7 users can’t let their guard down.

  • Squidoo
  • Multiply
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • TechNet
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Subscribe E-Newsletter

Don't get left behind. Sign up to receive the latest news.

Our Sponsors
Kerio
Ozaki
redwood
Super Micro
Kaspersky
KOSS
Xitrix
Western Digital
Emerson
Copylandia
JobsDB
ePLDT
Bitdefender
Multi-Color
mseedsystems
Smart
Peplink
Sophos
Astaro
itproasia
MEC
APC
wsi
Wolfpac
ArcusIT
 
 
 
PC World Magazine Subscription
subscribe now
Web Design